PCGaming

6483 readers

185 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

CSFFlame

Red Dead Redemption could finally be coming to PC, datamine suggests (www.videogameschronicle.com)

submitted 5 months ago by inclementimmigrant to c/pcgaming

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is there a good reason for people who have played the sequel to then play the original? I've only played RDR for a dozen or so hours. I liked that the NPCs weren't hyper-aggro like many are in RDR2, and the UI was less annoying, but the world and gameplay felt kind of lackluster and repetitive. Maybe getting the earlier part of the story makes it worthwhile?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

RDR2 is actually a prequel to RDR, if that helps you in your decision making.

[–] Zahille7 2 points 5 months ago

Also the first game is way more arcade-y than the immersive sim of the second.

[–] mipadaitu 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe they'll release the zombies expansion...