youCanCallMeDragon

Why cut them in half when we could continue to let them suffer for decades and accept none of the blame or consequences?

Comments acting like they would jump across the room like Spiderman. Some people are only happy when they’re angry.

That’s because it is funny

I’ve never done ketamine but going into a K-hole in a hot tub sounds incredibly dangerous. I don’t know what’s more sad if it was planned or not.

I have been on my laptop with 4Gb nvidia gpu. If you’re using the webgui there’s optimization parameters like xformers and I think opt.sdp.attention or something that uses about half the amount of memory. I had to update the graphics card to get it working first.

Wow what model are you using?

Very…

You can make assumptions about things based on their names, but it will often lead you astray as we have already covered. Koala bears aren’t bears and life insurance doesn’t keep you alive. Believe it or not, there is a lot of information accessible to you about these concepts other than their names.

Those two concepts are incompatible. I’m assuming we’re both American so you’ve probably heard that capitalism means free market exchange of goods and services but that’s actually just commerce and is a feature of every economic system. The defining trait of capitalism is actually that one guy can own the means of production and is entitled to the capital produced. Whereas in socialism and communism there is no private ownership of production.

It would be difficult to make a semantically coherent argument for someone who doesn’t know the definitions of the words you’re saying.

You should read that other comment again. The democratization of production as opposed to private ownership is the communal part of communism you were looking for. It’s the profit goes to the workers instead of Jeff Bezos and his investors as in capitalism. If you demand that the root of the word mean something else then of course the argument makes no sense.

Does your understanding of communism stop at semantics? If you’re going to be strongly opposed to something you should at least know what it is. Otherwise your arguments are limited to being the slightest breeze.