yetAnotherUser

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

Tipp 1: Füge die öffentliche BisschenSturzbach Liste als Verfolger hinzu (IdiotenZentrum Zeiger)

Tipp 2: Suche nach Alternativen, auf allen möglichen Seiten. Es gibt auch Meta-Sturzbach-Suchmaschinen!

Tipp 3: Private Verfolger haben extrem viel Inhalt, versuche dort beizutreten

Tipp 4: NutzNetz, kostet aber leider Geld für Anbieter und Indizierer

MfG durchschnittlicher Linux ION Genießer

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

It doesn't look like AI art to me, there are no inconsistencies.

For example, the smoke in the background doesn't simply stop after passing behind the hippo.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ew that's disgusting

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Switzerland has:

  • the lowest amount of area per km of track, except for micro nations
  • a fairly low amount of population per km of track - among the top 10 if population density is considered
  • lost less than 10% of tracks since its historical peak
  • a majority nationalized rail network
  • (as you mentioned) a fully electrified network

While I haven't travelled in Japan by rail (or any other mode), I have been to Switzerland. From what I've heard, in Japan there are many smaller local stations, where an ancient train arrives a few times a day.

Whereas in Switzerland, it seems like nearly every local station has at least one train per hour.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Switzerland.

Japan has outstanding high speed rail but that's pretty much it. Local train servives are, from what I've heard, subpar in terms of frequency. The share of goods transported via rail is also comparatively low.

Check out these numbers and sort by each colum, Switzerland is always near the top (for population/size adjusted values)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_rail_transport_network_size#Countries_with_active_network

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, but similar flaws exist for your proof.

The algebraic proof that 0.999... = 1 must first prove why you can assign 0.999... to x.

My "proof" abuses algebraic notation like this - you cannot assign infinity to a variable. After that, regular algebraic rules become meaningless.

The proper proof would use the definition that the value of a limit approaching another value is exactly that value. For any epsilon > 0, 0.999.. will be within the epsilon environment of 1 (= the interval 1 ± epsilon), therefore 0.999... is 1.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Ich mag Hitler nicht

Ich mage Biden nicht

=> Hitler = Biden

q.e.d.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a tautology when talking about any potential American president

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately not an ideal proof.

It makes certain assumptions:

  1. That a number 0.999... exists and is well-defined
  2. That multiplication and subtraction for this number work as expected

Similarly, I could prove that the number which consists of infinite 9's to the left of the decimal separator is equal to -1:

...999.0 = x
...990.0 = 10x

Calculate x - 10x:

x - 10x = ...999.0 - ...990.0
-9x = 9
x = -1

And while this is true for 10-adic numbers, it is certainly not true for the real numbers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Germans do.

E-Auto is the German word for EV, the author accidentally translated it literally, I presume

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

das absorbierende Element

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Hardly anyone supports painting/blocking private jets. Remember, nearly everyone believes they're just temporarily embarassed millionaires.

view more: ‹ prev next ›