Yeah. The more accurate wording is "forbids employers from retaliating against employees who--"
xantoxis
joined 1 year ago
Why can't these regulations be actual crimes, with criminal consequences for the perpetrator. And if he's ordering someone else to do the firing, it's "conspiracy to commit regulatory fraud".
Just let it succeed. But don't give me any candy-ass "serve the summoned entity forever". They should be digested forever.
I mean come on, how many times do you have to have to hear "there are worse fates than death" in cosmic horror? You know exactly what to do.
"Democracy dies in darkness" was aspirational.
Anyway, good job dipshit, now you've made a much bigger story about the fact that the WaPo endorses Harris and Bezos doesn't.
i like that all you needed was a hit to win but when you see the christian baby, you shift to a home run stance.
The missing words are "shitty" and "fucking", btw. I feel like we're getting crap posts like this from bots that aren't willing to tailor their posts for places where naughty words are allowed. Or reposts of bots' output. Either way, I'm tired of it.
This is exactly what it is. When everything you believe is made up, it's easy to accidentally make up the wrong number and then believe that instead.
The only part of this that's confusing is the headline. Wouldn't a "repeat of 2020" be Trump getting his ass handed to him again?
Oh look, the fucking devil has something to say. Tell us, Mitch, was this a realization that suddenly came upon you or was it absolutely crystal clear to you already when you were confirming his fucking nominees for the SC? When you refused to vote for his impeachment conviction, twice? I'd put you up on the wall right next to him.
I'm mostly just impressed at whoever came up with a plausible-looking and fairly professional icon for it.
Well I'm certainly surprised that the WaPo itself produced a story about it. Someone over there has some cajones.