vzq

joined 2 years ago
[–] vzq 14 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It’s worse: they are banking on fusion and SMR, which are pipe dreams even at twice the time scale:

“We are looking at fusion and new-generation fission with completely different tools compared to large-scale nuclear plants of the past,” he stated.

I hope they are lying knowing they are lying.

[–] vzq 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

A few streets here re-introduced street parking explicitly as a traffic calming measure (in addition to a separate bike lane behind the parked cars).

I know it works. I can tell it works. But I still don’t really like it.

[–] vzq 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

If people were respectful of people with impairments and their needs, instead of hijacking the terminology for playground insults, there would be no treadmill.

Everyone is temporarily abled, at best.

The issue is not whether their needs are special or exceptional. It’s that there are needs that need to be met.

[–] vzq 8 points 17 hours ago

If you are not either rich or in possession of a working pancreas, that means you have displeased god.

[–] vzq 10 points 17 hours ago

There’s pretty solid research about these things from the past 30 years or so. At this point, ignoring literature is just rank anti-intellectualism.

Good luck, sounds like you’re going to need it.

[–] vzq 1 points 17 hours ago

They came out swinging in Zelenskyy’s defense earlier, so now the owners phoned the editors up and told them to come up with an excuse on why it’s Ukraine’s fault after all.

[–] vzq 1 points 17 hours ago

That guy sure issues a lot of “ultimatums”. I wonder what that word means.

[–] vzq 14 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Ah yes. Riding American exceptionalism all the way down.

[–] vzq 10 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Wait, how do “bike lanes worsen traffic congestion”?

[–] vzq 11 points 18 hours ago (20 children)

I’m sorry, can someone explain this to me?

[–] vzq 1 points 18 hours ago

It was not a “dispute”. It was a deliberate, public, proof of loyalty towards Putin.

We know he demands his sycophants publicly burn their bridges to the west. See also Lukashenko.

[–] vzq 2 points 5 days ago

I love how the comment degenerates into madness slowly like a bad copy pasta.

 

This has great circlebroke potential.

view more: next ›