user

joined 2 years ago
[–] user -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Comparing not recommending games based on politics they dont agree with, to racisists. Congratulations.

[–] user 9 points 5 months ago
[–] user 1 points 5 months ago

None. This person doesn't know what they are talking about and they try to discredit the project based on their personal views and demonize the dev team.

[–] user 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, you demonstrate that you don't have the sufficient knowledge. There is no commerical device with open-source firmware. "Security Requirements" are not some kind of marketing bullshit as you seem to think. Graphene's can be found here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

I doubt you understand what any of them mean, since you seemingly think Windows 11 requirements are just random things that are just there to hurt you.

You thinking that Stock Google devices are more secure than GOS simply shows that you fundamentally lack the understanding of how things work. They are built on the same core but Graphene has massively reduced attack surface and fewer ways to exploit remotely. And then we didn't even talk about the hardened kernel and such.

I wouldn't try to discredit projects I don't know anything about if I were you.

[–] user 4 points 5 months ago

It does not "ship" them. They are available at your option. Other solutions to solve the google problem such as MicroG have/had several security issues. My favourite was when they leaked user passwords.

[–] user 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

By this logic rpiOS sucks because its only supported on Raspberry PIs. Only Pixel hardware meets the security requirements of Graphene.

[–] user 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You really have 0 understanding on how all this works 😭

[–] user 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Name only one reason that is relevant from a technical standpoint.

[–] user 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Not the only one but its factually the best one. Questionable to me is your expertise on this topic when you deter people from using the best option, based on your unrelated, subjective, non-technical views.

[–] user 1 points 6 months ago

You can read their own privacy policy, in which they admit to everything: https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/en-ww

Ignore their bullshit marketing as for "why" they collect it and when they try to justify it. Look at the facts laid out.

[–] user 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Can you read their source-code? Nope. And they falsely advertise their phones as Privacy alternatives when they collect just as much data as Google.

view more: ‹ prev next ›