user

joined 1 year ago
[–] user -1 points 3 months ago

Because you make it that. Its political for you but for me, no.

[–] user -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] user 1 points 3 months ago

Graphene already supports Winevine L1 without Play Integrity. It has nothing to do with DRM, its a seperate system.

[–] user 2 points 3 months ago

I've always got help, and the moderators are really nice.

961
Gogle (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by user to c/[email protected]
 
[–] user 7 points 3 months ago

You practically cant brick it with the very simple Web Installer.

[–] user 1 points 3 months ago

Hivemind moment

[–] user 1 points 3 months ago

That is not a webview. You have to understand what you're talking about.

[–] user -3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

No. Even if a Firefox webview existed, it woul'd not use the extensions from your main browser. An adblock option is available from the native alpha settings if you're interested.

[–] user 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is unrelated. You want to familiarize yourself with the concept of OS integrity and how it is different from data encryption. You can have a passphrase that encrypts your data alongside having access to these hardware features.

[–] user 0 points 3 months ago

It has very minimal code and its implemented in a robust manner. Unlike UEFI and the desktop implementation of secure boot, it does work well and it has not yet been exploited on pixels. Its way better to have any kind of OS integrity check than none.

[–] user 0 points 3 months ago

What a smart thing to say 🥱

[–] user -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The fact that youre illiterate and you're hallucinating stuff i never said, is sad. I will address your concern however.

If you think that they are actually not encrypting the message content, then you're a conspiracy theorist. They have thousands of other ways to track the user and give metadata to law enforcement. There is no need for them to lie about protecting the messages, as none of the regular users care about that. They had more than enough users of Messenger even before it was E2EE.

333
asdf (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by user to c/[email protected]
 
939
submitted 4 months ago by user to c/[email protected]
 
1762
please (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by user to c/[email protected]
 
1184
Title (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by user to c/linuxmemes
 
71
submitted 11 months ago by user to c/linuxmemes
1037
opinion (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by user to c/linuxmemes
 
39
use dev build (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by user to c/linuxmemes
 
43
windows update (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by user to c/linuxmemes
 
79
submitted 1 year ago by user to c/linuxmemes
 
-16
submitted 1 year ago by user to c/lemmyworld
 

What's the point of federation, when we will end up having large clumps of users in specific communites under instances, where the owners of the instance can censor information, and enforce their political ideological false authory over everyone. If somebody doesn't agree they can be banned without any valid reason. Federation is censorship resistant only to large government entities. We fail to realise that the issue with censorship is the owners and admins.

And yes, we can meke new instances that support our beliefs and that doesnt censor our speech, but then again we dont have an evenly distributed userbase. Having duplicate communities is cojnter intuitive anyways because it will confuse users. Lemmy is a failed project in my eyes unless they find a way to resolve these issues somehow.

Bad example but if i start a torrent, then the people who seed will own just as much of the torrent as i do. I'll be equal with the peers without any upper hand. It cant be taken down or censored. Thats the idea i had.

view more: next ›