schwim

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 
5
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by schwim to c/alexandrite
 

I love the added usability of Alexandrite but unless you can block entire instances in it either natively or via greasescript, it is unusable for me.

Thanks for your time!

 

With enough Funky Green Panels(tm), anything is possible.

[–] schwim 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This isn't news. This has been Brave's business model from the beginning.

 
[–] schwim 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is a pretty good hyperbolic rant. Nothing positive, all negative and an unsubstantiated "I can't prove it but I think they're doing this because..." which always gets the blood pumping and fingers flying. I give you an 8 out of 10. I could have given you a solid 10 on this effort if you had blamed the libs or a cabal for the nefarious deeds occurring in your about:config.

They didn't hide the release of the ~~bug~~ feature, they posted it on the Moz website for future patch notes.

The "for now" about the config setting actually made me chuckle. It's an option that you can optionally choose to disable. They're not testing their evil deeds on you by letting you turn it off.

Google is making their move because of their ad dollars at stake, Firefox will only benefit in terms of market share when that happens because they'll have another bump in user count in the form of a mini-exodus from Chrome, just like they did when Chrome announced stopping ad blockers from running in their browser. Almost all income from Moz comes from partnerships with the search providers listed in the browser search options. 0 dollars comes from advertising, so there is absolutely no reason for them to keep you from blocking advertisements on pages that only helps their competitor.

It's very clear to anyone that's paid attention that Moz is trying to protect a user that's downloaded a malicious addon(or one that's been hijacked) from siphoning data like login/pass on your banking site when, for example, the addon is supposed to only change the youtube site from displaying shorts in your feed. Prior to this ~~bug~~ feature, an addon that could see all data on a webpage could see all data on any webpage, whether it needed it on that page or not which is comically bad practice. They've finally implemented a method of restricting addons that don't need to see your most sensitive browsing from doing something nefarious like selling that data, using it against you or robbing you blind with it.

Here's the best part of it all though. Simply use a forked version of the browser if you feel you're using one now that an evil entity is trying to enslave you with by forcing you to see their competitor's advertisements(logic!). There's many "hardened" versions of Firefox, like librewolf, which strips Mozilla phone-home stuff like telemetry, sync, etc., The code is open source meaning you can build your own from the sourcecode, which will allow you to pore over every line, looking for hidden treasures that are trying to ruin your browsing experience. Or at least make an uninformed guess that is what it's doing.

[–] schwim 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish they would make it possible and/or create a second filter making a distinction between porn and other NSFW.

[–] schwim 2 points 1 year ago

I would wager a candy bar or two were involved in the diabolical lib plan.

 
[–] schwim 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank you very much for your help. Unfortunately, this isn't the case for my current need but will keep the tip in mind for the future.

 

Hey there neighbors,

I use Connect on my phone for the necessary feature but haven’t found a web solution yet. Basically, I’m in dire need of blocking an entire instance, as it’s made me not want to visit Lemmy when at the computer.

To clarify, I don’t need all the features of Connect, just instance blocking in the web browser or a PC app. I'm not looking for a sorting/filtering change to subscribed, again, it's just a single instance I need to remove from the feed.

Thanks for your time!

[–] schwim 4 points 1 year ago

People fork what's what they're using and what's popular. Chromium has the vast majority of the market share so it's most likely to get modified and reused.

[–] schwim 1 points 1 year ago

but it definitely isn’t a way to consume content you actually want.

No, it's not the way you want. Barring a single instance, it's literally the way I want to consume the content.

 

Hey there neighbors,

I use Connect on my phone for the necessary feature but haven't found a web solution yet. Basically, I'm in dire need of blocking an entire instance, as it's made me not want to visit Lemmy when at the computer.

To clarify, I don't need all the features of Connect, just instance blocking in the web browser or a PC app.

Thanks for your time!

[–] schwim 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People crossposting to the comical number of same-but-mines-different-communities can shit up a feed pretty quick. I'd suggest cutting down on a few of your tech groups and see how it works for you then.

 
 
[–] schwim 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's Twitter? Do you mean X?

[–] schwim 2 points 1 year ago

When I see these posts, I picture the tweet came from these guys.

 
[–] schwim -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has taken over most social media apps

A lot of the people using the "fediverse" are here because of the things that most social media shovels at it's users. I don't think I would use that as an example of why it should be available to us.

[–] schwim 8 points 1 year ago

UG has gotten terrible in their funding funnel. It's pretty much just a straight drop into a wallet squeeze at this point.

 
 

I think a lot of us would admit to daydreaming about a find like this when we're driving back roads.

view more: ‹ prev next ›