randoot

joined 1 year ago
[–] randoot 1 points 6 days ago

They're all racing to build super intelligent AI. The first one to get there could essentially become God. So zelon and mark are desperately trying to buy time.

[–] randoot 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Therese fucking idiots fell for Eloina's propaganda and handed the Gazans to the butcher.

Now this author thinks they can mobilize to ask for cease fire? Good fucking luck you dumb ass.

How ironic would it be if the fat Cheeto deports them all to Gaza for protesting.

  • signed, angry ex-muslim
[–] randoot 46 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Who's going to enforce it? The House? The Senate? The supreme Court?

The law is just pieces of paper if the people who are supposed to enforce it don't want to.

[–] randoot 90 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Well now you've handed Gaza to the butcher and good luck if you want to protest without getting arrested.

[–] randoot 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Choosing not to vote is participation whether you like it or not. Your so called protest doesn't help change the system either. All it accomplishes is kill more Palestinians. It's a fucked up system and we should absolutely do everything we can to change it, but not voting doesn't absolve you of the excess deaths of innocents.

You have a chance to help people but you're too morally pure so instead you choose to plug your ears while they get murdered and tell yourself letting them die was the right choice morally.

If Trump wins and Israel ends up murdering everyone, I'll come back to this comment and remind you.

[–] randoot 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Here's the reality; we're all playing the trolley problem but it's with real people and unfortunately the only options are kill more people or kill less people. If you know that by not voting you're killing more people then you can't claim you're not responsible for their deaths.

If you really care go out and protest the system after the election. Choosing to let more people die now is a protest but you have blood on your hands.

[–] randoot 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I know you're being sarcastic, but for those too young to remember; look up the tiki torch Nazi rallies from Trump's term.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/12/us/white-nationalists-tiki-torch-march-trnd/index.html

[–] randoot 49 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I'm a person that would 100% buy a Tesla if it wasn't for him.

[–] randoot 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait what does it say about me if I instantly want one

[–] randoot 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe we're strawmaning each other. I would be fine with a 1-2% tax on billionaire wealth that's sitting as unrealized gains.

Taxing me on the value of my house is absolutely similar to taxing unrealized gains. If my house gained value that doesn't mean my income did. There is no guarantee that I can afford it. I can't sell my house to pay the tax. The same arguments used to defend billionaires applies to me as well, but somehow we're supposed to feel bad for them but we're ok with the middle class paying essentially the same thing as unrealized gains on the asset they own that's mostly likely 99% of their net worth.

Can you tell me what is broken with expecting someone that holds $100b in unrealized gains to pay %1 tax on it

[–] randoot 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's all great but then why the fuck am I paying property tax on my house that is mostly unrealized gains. Before you go arguing to abolish property tax, I'm fine with it. My property tax goes to make my neighbor better, and provide services and schooling for my neighbors.

Billionaires become rich because their companies benefit from highways, regulated internet, a public educated work force, etc.. so they should pay their fare share.

Taxing unrealized gains for 99% is ok, it should be the same for the 1%.

 

LLMs are solving MCAT, the bar test, SAT etc like they're nothing. At this point their performance is super human. However they'll often trip on super simple common sense questions, they'll struggle with creative thinking.

Is this literally proof that standard tests are not a good measure of intelligence?

 

Alt text: Even with a blank map, a lot of people can only name 45-50 of the 64 states.

view more: next ›