Yeah, the more I read the less impressed I was--though I'm always willing to accept the probability I'm not smart enough to grasp an author's idea. Seems like a subject that may have run its course in reasonable analysis and this is all that is left to scrabble about in for ideas.
pdxfed
I can't help with that, but let me transfer you to someone who you'll get to explain it all to over again.
Moore was way to the left of Obama and always has been. What you want, him to get up on stage at every moderate and right winger and shout "I'm still correct and more progressive that you are" to prove he's consistent?
Dude hasn't changed what he does since the beginning, maybe pay attention.
He's been on a roll since 1989 with Roger and Me, the hell do you mean "lately"?
For a whole 5 years...then it can move its operations and taxes offshore.
US businesses wetting their lips for raping what little of the public services are left in US under trifecta trump.
For the basic plan, based on usage though it looks like you'd save more with our premium tier that allows unlimited flushes per day and includes our smellfesh scent subscription.
Employee salaries in HR; they are both correctly paid(employer perspective often), underpaid (employee perspective often), and overpaid (company and co-worker perspective). Depending on how and how often you open the box, any of these views can be accurate.
If you're shocked that broad corporate fair-weather astroturfing wasn't actually what it claimed, you were naive. The speed coming the other way--from not acknowledging LGBTQ or other minority groups existed as humans who deserve a voice or consideration to sponsoring pride shirts and hiring visibly tokenized figureheads--should have been indicative the change wasn't organic, which means it wasn't going to stick at the first pressure; economic, political, or other.
Companies largely follow non-discrimination laws related to employment not because it's the right thing to do, but because they can be sued easily under federal and many states' employment laws. Don't put your time into company-run employee groups, put it into getting progressives elected and engaging with unionization so you can take your place at the table rather than waiting for it to be given.
Sample bias. Any advertising, campaigning, fawning and celebrating are the exceptions. You are exposed to the "success stories" exponentially more through media thanks to government and corporate forces despite the successes being exponentially rarer than the failures: suicides, mental health disorders, divorces, denied medical care by VA, insufficiency of college fund programs, underemployment, etc. The coverage Success Stories get as the 1% or whatever, dwarfs the failures which are the 99%. This reversed representation explains why they may be perceived as equally likely, which is confusing.
The answer is sample bias; deliberately misleading. After all, who is going to sign up if they could see reality represented? Most would just work fast food--same crappy outcomes, fewer bullets.
Banning the (unfortunately dominant) mode of transportation without having the viable alternative ready is so fucking naive it hurts. Where is HSR? Where are the needed effective commuter rail projects?
Foundational agreement....a concept of a plan, if you will.