nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

I care, and I do work in my community to free us all from oppression. I don't spend time trying to convince Internet strangers to adopt my ideology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0291791#sec014

this study also relies on poore-nemecek 2018, a study that misuses source data and doesn't disclose this, and which draws some pretty hyperbolic conclusions. I disregard poore-nemecek entirely, and find papers that cite it dubious at best.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

this is hard to understand. has anyone else independently reproduced this? if not, we should probably just suspend judgement on their claims until we have more information.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

I'm not trying to recruit you. I'm telling you what I think. if you want to know more, you can read what I've read.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (8 children)

I want to abolish all unjust hierarchy. if you want to know more, I recommend reading Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.

edit: more contemporary literature would include anything by the invisible committee or crimethinc. Haymarket books is a great resource for all kinds of great anarchist literature.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (10 children)

I said clearly abolition of all unjust hierarchy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (12 children)

that happens now. I'm proposing that we eliminate systems that make it worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

calling me names won't change the facts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

no, I'm examining your position, and the evidence provided, and found that they are insufficient.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

turns out, everything is political, so, yes, it's all propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

I haven't seen them, but I do know they work with the pentagon, so my guess is they aim to legitimize American hegemony and military spending

view more: ‹ prev next ›