noughtnaut

joined 2 years ago
[–] noughtnaut 1 points 1 day ago

You know what they say about men with big hands... They have huge >!nostrils!<.

[–] noughtnaut 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, it was even perfectly official. Unfortunately, Android changed from under it and they never bother to update it so these days it will just fail to start.

[–] noughtnaut 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I used to be an avid TealScript user, which allowed you to tweak recognition of individual characters and even create entirely new gestures. It was magnificent.

Went through a lot of Palm devices, from a Palm III to a V to a Tungsten T3 (the most elegantly designed device ever, perhaps save the Mac SE) and eventually a Treo 680. It was a sad day when the ecosystem shut down and I had to downgrade to an Android phone.

I still miss so many features of those older devices. In fact, I still keep a Palm V in my nightstand because of its comfortably backlog screen and flawless handwriting recognition for those midnight thoughts.

[–] noughtnaut 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow, you are the first person I've "met" who even knows about that book. Fistbump. I have a copy (since my dad used to work as an Apple distributor back then, this was way before they had retail stores like they do now).

While I can see that a good bit of that relatively slim book is (now) less than ideal, it still hurts to see how much UI and UX across all platforms is going downhill. I don't even recognise a "for the sake of X" because there seems to be no rhyme or reason to it (other than "it's different and therefore more better. Also, I made this").

[–] noughtnaut 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well it whooshed me, so here's your chance to shine with your magnificent knowledge! 😉

[–] noughtnaut 1 points 4 weeks ago

It's beautifully crafted for sure. One thing gives it away as a definitely not Apple developed device: they would never have oriented the "Macintosh" branding in such a way that it's upside down when carried!

[–] noughtnaut 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because 12pt text becomes 8pt text and it's a hassle to scale the entire UI... for the apps that even a allow that. Imagine playing Quake (why the hell not) at a gajillion by bajillion pixels: glorious resolution, but what's my health again? Better to stay in the original SVGA or whatever it was. Exaggerating, but I'm sure you follow.

[–] noughtnaut 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

...and then you're locked out of using your phone to pay for things, can't install banking apps and marginal ID apps, et cetera. 😢

[–] noughtnaut 1 points 2 months ago

Consider that the (in electric cars, obviously next-)most power hungry item on cars back then was the wind shield wiper motor. Modern cars easily put out 100kW, but then spend most of that in a thousand little ways. Back then, a 20W engine would be plenty.

[–] noughtnaut 4 points 2 months ago

There's a bit from Clarkson where he compares an old school aluminium-bodied Land Rover to the newfangled SUV things of the same brand. Used to be, switching to 4WD involved pulling a lever connected to a ferry-sized piece of metal going ka-chunk. Nowadays, you press a button and a red light comes on. How is that going to get you out of a ditch?

[–] noughtnaut 8 points 2 months ago

I want to see a MUCH higher resolution version of this photo. To study both that Wall-mounted proton pack and that exquisite hat.

[–] noughtnaut 6 points 2 months ago

In my experience, neither Slack nor other apps (that all blow Teams out of the water) can do that - except Discord, which isn't exactly a common office meeting app.

 

This is likely a very niche request, but perhaps there's a genius here with the answer - or can point me to a better place to ask.

If I want it to look like a web page is loading an interlaced gif over an old modem connection, would there exist some tool to convert a given static image to an animated gif (preferably downsampled to 256 colours)?

You know, the one where it starts off as one giant coloured block which then gets progressively segmented into thinner lines with more detail as each interlaced line is received...

 

From my understanding, (a) the brain has no nerves, which is why you can talk to people while doing brain surgery on them; and (b) headache is caused by blood vessels constricting. Now, I am unsure whether migraines are also caused by blood vessels constricting, but in any case - what is it that is doing the sensing of this pain? Or is it a(nother) case of the brain just making shit up because it hates me?

view more: next ›