nomecks

Let's not forget the jobs it would bring!

The government released the following photo of the test set up:

Does he like off road trucks? Spin Tires. My 5 year old loves it.

He's right. Intel dumped their Tick Tock fast development cycle and let their product lines languish. Real stupid way to generate short term investor gains.

This goes for anything with large capacitors.

A laser. Nothing too powerful, maybe 10w. I don't need a death ray, just enough to burn stuff.

If the boot fits...

You argue like you're 12.

Again, why am I going to make hydrogen when I can more efficiently charge a battery? Why would a charging station do the same?

Hydrogen cars exist? Show me the commercial implementation of it.

Guys like you have no idea how the world actually operates. It's telling that you have to resort to attacking my character ("people like me are like this") rather than having your argument stand on facts.

It won't happen at all, because you can't seem to make any arguments beside "It's cleaner" and "You're a BEV fanatic". If that's seriously the arguments for hydrogen, it's doomed.

The truth is that you're arguing that a theoretical technology is going to win out over the one with tens of billions of dollars of current invetment and millions of vehicles already operating. All this while providing no actual benefit to the end consumer over BEV.

I'm sure you have something to back up "they'll have no choice", because right now it seems like hydrogen is getting left in the dust. Even the champions of hydrogen, Toyota, have relented and are building a fleet of BEVs. Spoiler alert: they're not going to build out two separate assembly lines, no matter how much they want hydrogen to win.