lightscription

Oh shit! Get down, Martin! The nonviolent gunmen will murder you again to pay themselves what they robed us all of (tax), rape and molest our kids (facts; it's what the military police state does), call you a "dirty animal," and police murder and incarcerate citizens at among the highest rates in the world---all to proclaim the virtues of "nonviolence."

And how would you create real change?

All is impasse.

Moderates and increments clearly do nothing.

"Conspiracy as Governance" by Julian Assange

https://www.frontlineclub.com/julian_assange_the_state_and_terrorist_conspiracies/

However, not every category like "Military" supports the Reddit .onion and it is monopolized by Google and not nearly as cool as Lemmy and the Fediverse.

This could be an interesting spot, but got to find regular contributors. I would like to hear from more vets and active duty myself. Could be a more conservative group on the whole though and would prefer other or no social media.

This one doesn't seem that active, does it? Probably an instance somewhere. Reddit does.

Silver fox with perfect aim! Bond cannot fail!

If being attacked by the god-damned ectoplasms were "ordinary," then there would have been a Warhol of it (iconic, mass-produced tin cans, etc) and then people could get some 'tang over it!

yes, the more layers of security, the better, even if it is just a futile matter of time to consume the time of an ATP.

Ah, that must be it. 2FA is still a very good security feature to have.

But there is nothing only you know that is still useful because a secret must be shared in order to be useful (unless you just have full disk encryption and then when it is unlocked and network connected, it is still vulnerable). In short, admins could change your password since you are not the sole admin of your own server but then you would have to have mass appeal to be "useful", i.e. popular.

In theory, Tim Cook might have a keybearer who could usurp the throne with all the proprietary OEM crypto keys that only the Company knows, but everyone knows who the CEO is and the keybearer could get in big trouble unless he had an army...

Things can be changed on the server side and the network is not the same as the device: these are technology truths some people refuse to ever understand.

No, nothing shady. Just was notified there was a mistake on the server end. Perhaps tmi to elaborate...

This is what I thought. I keep telling people they don't exclusively own their passwords / security tokens once they give it to a site.

If I shared encrypted info that I kept encrypted, I guess it would still be mine but no one could then read it.

This is what I thought. I keep telling people they don't exclusively own their passwords / security tokens once they give it to a site. Salted hashes to obscure the pw don't even matter since the admin could also bypass that. Tanks for the validation.