lightsblinken

joined 5 months ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
One of the seven great wonders of the Internet in c/memes
Freaky Flavors in c/microblogmemes
[–] lightsblinken 2 points 2 weeks ago

about having salt and vinegar in a food combo

Freaky Flavors in c/microblogmemes
[–] lightsblinken 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

whaaaaa? are you.. sure?

Trump Disavowed Project 2025 During the Campaign. Not Anymore. in c/politics
[–] lightsblinken 12 points 2 weeks ago

i'm grateful for your service!

Australia bans social media for under 16s in c/technology
[–] lightsblinken 3 points 2 weeks ago

"best worst case?"

Kate Nash and Lily Allen on OnlyFans should be a wake-up call for the music industry in c/nottheonion
[–] lightsblinken 11 points 3 weeks ago

good answer :)

Microsoft’s controversial Recall scraper is finally entering public preview in c/technology
[–] lightsblinken 2 points 3 weeks ago

nope

Do any non-corpos actually like AI slop? in c/asklemmy
[–] lightsblinken 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

its the speed of the change innit. for example, the fact that google power requirements has increase 50% in the last year must have a tremendous impact.

Do any non-corpos actually like AI slop? in c/asklemmy
[–] lightsblinken 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

sounds like a frog in a saucepan.. sure is getting warmer!

Stuck in the middle with you in c/[email protected]
[–] lightsblinken 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.

Clever, clever in c/[email protected]
[–] lightsblinken 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

wot? please explain, with diagrams!

Norwegian government to set 15-year age limit for using social media in c/technology
[–] lightsblinken 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

its the point where people say "but a sneaky vpn will get around so we may as well do nothing" is equivalent to "my friend can buy me a sneaky drink so we may as well do nothing"... just because you can exploit a law doesn't make it invalid. enforcement concerns are valid, but it seems reasonable to start with "i agree there is a problem" and go for the 80% rule

view more: next ›