lemonmelon

YDI GFY GG NO RE

Great, then we see eye to eye on it. I think it needs to be made as explicit as it possibly can be, so I responded with my own thoughts. It's wonderful to know that more than one person can share a viewpoint.

Connections
Puzzle #589
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩

Disengage should only be enforceable if it's invoked in good faith. Posting a wall of text and using it to get the last word forfeits any protection it provides. It's the equivalent of calling for a fair catch in American football, then attempting a return.

Immediate edit: it doesn't even have to be a wall of text. Any response included with the disengage request invites further discussion and suggests that there is a desire to continue the conversation, at least to the extent of having the final say.

Jan. 19, 2025 

 T   I   G   H   T   R   O   P   E 
✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ 💔 ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ 🎉

My Score: 2170

Wordle 1,310 X/6*

⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩

Connections
Puzzle #588
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Strands #321
“O ___! My ___!”
🟡🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵🔵

Connections
Puzzle #587
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Calling someone a chaser solely on the grounds that they claim to have dated a trans woman could imply "no cis male could be interested in a trans woman outside of pure fetish bait", which is awfully reductive. It casts the trans woman as an object in the relationship rather than an equal partner.

Not sure what your personal definition of "tankie" is, but by any rational measure @[email protected] doesn't fit the bill.

If an app has IMEI access, it could indeed make/manage calls, among other things. I would probably like it more if it were phrased along the lines of "permission to read IMEI", but that would mean noting to most users. Instead, the description of the permission is for the most impactful thing that a common user would understand (assuming they're paying attention to what permissions an app requests at all).