this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
7 points (59.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

580 readers
513 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

FYI @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] and a few others

A rage bait post they just restored: https://lemmy.world/post/24282976. The initial removal was about rule 3 - no rage baiting. That rule has been removed.

Another rage bait comment against vegans: https://lemmy.world/comment/14535452

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ye I should probably add smt. Just a lot to do.

The point of the disengage is that sometimes you might not necessarily want to block a person. Blocking still allows them to talk shit about you without you seeing it for example. The disengage is a way to say "ok, let's agree to disagree before things get (more) flamey" in a succinct and official manner. You don't always want to block everyone you get into a heated argument with, so there's good to have a way to disengage where neither party feels like they have to have the final word.

I hope lemmy at some point would give us a way to lock individual comment threads.

[–] lemonmelon 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Disengage should only be enforceable if it's invoked in good faith. Posting a wall of text and using it to get the last word forfeits any protection it provides. It's the equivalent of calling for a fair catch in American football, then attempting a return.

Immediate edit: it doesn't even have to be a wall of text. Any response included with the disengage request invites further discussion and suggests that there is a desire to continue the conversation, at least to the extent of having the final say.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I said already, yes

[–] lemonmelon 0 points 21 hours ago

Great, then we see eye to eye on it. I think it needs to be made as explicit as it possibly can be, so I responded with my own thoughts. It's wonderful to know that more than one person can share a viewpoint.