krayj

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] krayj 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would NEVER recommend a modern HP printer, but...I have a HP Laserjet 4000 (Circa 1997) that I 'acquired' from the company I worked for that went bankrupt.

This thing refuses to die. current impression count is over 500,000 prints. All its patents expired over a decade ago, and it's still easy to find parts and toner (originals, and now even 3rd party knockoffs). It's old enough now that modern generic drivers have built in support for it. The only parts I've ever had to replace are the rubber sheet feeder rollers which dry out and stop working correctly after 12-15 years.

So, I guess the point here is that some really solid printers were made a couple decades ago, back when manufacturers still took pride in their products, and they are old enough that the hardware is no longer protected by patents (so practically open) and robust driver support without all the bullshit. Picking up something from this era and cleaning it up would come close to satisfying a lot of your requirements.

[–] krayj 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You are mistaken. City ordinances absolutely comes into play here. In the US, you are subject to federal law, any additional state laws, any additional county laws, and then any additional city municipal-codes/ordinances.

Here's the Seattle city ordinance that applies:

Seattle Municipal Code, Chapter 12A.10.130 Indecent Exposure, Paragraph A.

A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he or she intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.

source:

http://clerk.seattle.gov/search/ordinances/124301#:~:text=10%20as%20follows%3A-,12A.,cause%20reasonable%20affront%20or%20alarm.

[–] krayj 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I already named the jurisdiction: Seattle, Washington, USA.

The date/time shouldn't matter since the ordinances haven't changed, but it was Aug 12, 2012 just in case anyone reading this just happened to be in Seattle at the time and saw us. It was spectated by quite a number of people due to the size of the production - we had lights, a make-up/hair stylist, my assistant, the model, plus security.

[–] krayj 10 points 2 years ago

Putting a Netflix show on DVD and selling it is absolutely illegal unless they have a distribution license provided by the copyright holder.

It would be legal after copyright expires (in the US, copyright exists for the lifespan of the author/creator + 70 years). Keep in mind that the US has stricter copyright laws than most of the rest of the world.

For other items, like physical functional items, reproductions are generally legal unless the item is patented. And it would still not be legal for the reproduction to also reproduce any registered names or trademarks associated with the original. Example: you could legally reproduce and sell knockoff Nike Air Jordans as long as you didn't use the Nike swoosh or any likenesses of the copyrighted artwork. For items that are patented, or patent pending - making and selling reproductions is illegal - and for most patented items the reproduction doesn't even have to be identical for it to be infringing, just replicating the functionality is probably infringing.

[–] krayj 6 points 2 years ago

I have faced the same issue as OP. Clearing all app data (or uninstalling/reinstalling) works to fix it, but I get the impression that OP doesn't want to have to re-add and log back into their multiple lemmy accounts after doing that.

Ideally, liftoff would't go into a state of being nearly unusable when your default instance is having problems. That's the point of the post.

[–] krayj 40 points 2 years ago (19 children)

It depends entirely on the jurisdiction. Take the city of Seattle, for example (I know this because I planned an executed a nude photo shoot in public view inside the city limits and sought legal council ahead of time to ensure I wan't risking being charged with any crimes). The general rule for Seattle hinges on whether the activity is intended to tittilate or sexually arouse observers - and if that is obviously not the intent, then even full nudity is not illegal. Many other large cities have very similar ordinances.

The smaller the town, and the more conservative the region, the stricter and less flexible the ordinances. There are beaches in South Carolina, for example, where they even regulate the minimum amount of coverage for bikinis and beachware.

[–] krayj 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is the new community for sharing knowledge only, or is it also a place to ask questions (ie: "What is the etymology of [xyz]?")?

[–] krayj 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They can't be dumb enough to fall for the sunk cost fallacy can they? I think it must be something else.

[–] krayj 13 points 2 years ago

There are no benefits to it now...unless you are part of the minority who exploits and benefits from it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›