kernelle

joined 1 year ago
[–] kernelle 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

~Sounds~ ~like...~ you need to... ^git^ ^gud^

[–] kernelle 11 points 3 hours ago

You wanna go back to BBS? Cause I'll go back to BBS

[–] kernelle 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They have to be trolling... right?

[–] kernelle 3 points 2 days ago

Yea, and I would never claim it's perfect, there are no perfect systems. But one of the most powerful nations being that vulnerable to manipulation is something to witness.

[–] kernelle 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Usually in a democracy the people are represented by parties which they align most with. In my country I can vote for one of seven, which get proportionally represented by a number of seats in parliament. The winning party rarely has more than 50% of the vote, if they do, all the losing parties will become the opposition, and if they don't they have to combine with another party to have at least 50% of the votes. This assures that the winning party or coalition still has to negotiate their position and decisions every single day. If one party would want the power the current administration in the US has they would probably need 80 or 90% of the votes.

Is it complicated? Yes. Does it make sure the people are represented? Also yes.

In the US if a state votes 51% one way, 100% of the electoral votes go to that party, causing a reality where a party could get less than a majority vote and still win. This alone is proof that the people are not fairly represented and isn't a fair democracy. In local elections you'll have a much more nuanced choice but at a federal level it's antiquated to say the least.

I will say that in a fair democracy, you should vote for your representative, in the US you have no such choice. Be it by living in one state counts as more than another, or the fact that a third party has little to no representation post election.

[–] kernelle 17 points 5 days ago

shudders in NodeJS

[–] kernelle 9 points 1 week ago
        for i in range(1, len(a)):
            if a[i] < a[i-1]:
                like_all_things_should_be = False
                break

What's going on in Thanos' head in all that B-roll

[–] kernelle 29 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that's the actual scary part, last time he didn't know the extent of how far they could go. Now after 4 years of preparation...

I wish y'all the best of luck, the world knows you need it

[–] kernelle 5 points 2 weeks ago

A perfect welrod 10/10

[–] kernelle 15 points 2 weeks ago

Retail stores rarely carry a phone older than two years, as long as they push new phones every year, people will be buying those phones.

OEM's could have like 3 battery types, mass produce these 3 and offer battery replacement for maybe 30 bucks or less? OEM's could have like 3 phone designs and update the internals, making each screen replacement maybe 50 bucks or less? Instead each has unique screen, motherboard, subboard and battery combo. My 10y/o nokia has the same battery as a new one, they cost like 5 bucks each.

Needless to say I love the EU for bringing back user serviceable batteries, that's a great start.

[–] kernelle 7 points 2 weeks ago

Firstly, this is for creating concrete on mars, where resources are very scarce and making regular concrete is not viable. Secondly, to survive martian conditions, we need to build bases, a lot of very sturdy, structurally sound bases. And lastly, before the potato based concrete, blood was genuinely the most viable solution, being an easily renewable resource. IIRC the martian concrete is now magnitudes better than regular concrete.

[–] kernelle 2 points 3 weeks ago

I hear you, in a system where votes are distributed equally and where a duopoly isn't an eventuality, you're absolutely supposed to vote for the party you allign most with. The current system does not permit this, causing a black and white world of politics. Not participating in this is your right, and with two regular candidates, we'd probably never have this conversation.

One party has the rationality to change its opinion and work on mutually beneficial solutions, and the other party polarises the population, advocates for violence and creates lies and deceptions at every corner.

 

Abstract

Spyware makes surveillance simple. The last ten years have seen a global market emerge for ready-made software that lets governments surveil their citizens and foreign adversaries alike and to do so more easily than when such work required tradecraft. The last ten years have also been marked by stark failures to control spyware and its precursors and components. This Article accounts for and critiques these failures, providing a socio-technical history since 2014, particularly focusing on the conversation about trade in zero-day vulnerabilities and exploits. Second, this Article applies lessons from these failures to guide regulatory efforts going forward. While recognizing that controlling this trade is difficult, I argue countries should focus on building and strengthening multilateral coalitions of the willing, rather than on strong-arming existing multilateral institutions into working on the problem. Individually, countries should focus on export controls and other sanctions that target specific bad actors, rather than focusing on restricting particular technologies. Last, I continue to call for transparency as a key part of oversight of domestic governments' use of spyware and related components.

Keywords: cybersecurity, zero-day vulnerabilities, international law, espionage

PDF

579
Recycle rule (lemmy.world)
 
198
harry potter rule (lemmy.world)
 
 
 

The project included 17 academic researchers from 12 universities who were granted deep access by Facebook to aggregated data.

July 27, 2023, 8:00 PM CEST By Brandy Zadrozny

view more: next ›