[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Okay. Maybe I'm outing myself as an idiot... but I don't get it.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

"So what do you have? "

"A sword!"

"A sword?"

"Yes. And I can hit with it twice as often twice every hour."

"... I'll stick to my spellslots thank you."

"... It sounded better in my head."

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I should be more like ,,is paralyzed when struck with a stake through the heart". But thats ruins the joke.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Meanwhile I'm impressed by the fact, that Konsi used EXACTLY 25 words.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Aw. This is so cute. And dark. But mostly cute. I hope. More please.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Depends on the amount work put into the magic systems lore from the DMs side. (I once wrote the ,,Theorie of magical trinity: Command, energy and will" and there's a lot of other work out in the internet as well)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Commoner has a 10 in every stat.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I guess Heroes feast does not really count as cooking so...:

  • You could use wish and wish for the meal to be cooked perfectly
  • Mage hand is very helpful when you want to lift a hot pot or pan.
  • Since objects made by creation are real for the duration of the spell, you could create some food, it eat and even give your stomach time to... salvage the valuable parts before the spell ends
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hm. That could work. But it would be quite tedious.

Also: why 12 and not 8? Doesn’t a DC calculate 8+prof+ability?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Right. I correct: It’s not what 5e is best used for.

For the rest: That’s what I’m saying. From what I picked up (personal opinion) people really don’t like it when they don’t know what’s going on. But each their own. If your table is happy with it, go for it. I’m just advising against using it as a general rule, because some people don’t have much fun when the game goes this way.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

So he’s pretending and his companions don’t notice, or they all are?

-48
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
90
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
127
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
215
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
46
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
114
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
243
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
115
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
85
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
135
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Edit: A lot of people say, that GWM needs a melee weapon attack, but they miss Jesses point: While GWM requires a melee attack with a heavy weapon, Sharpshooters only criteria is an attack with a ranged weapon (not a ranged weapon attack). Jesse bases his claim on the fact, that a crossbow is still a ranged weapon, even if used as an improvised weapon for melee combat. That’s why it deals 1d4(!)+20 damage. (It works with any ranged, heavy weapon btw., so Longbow qualifies too.) Of course Jesse is playing the devils advocate here and of course, no somewhat sane Walter will allow this in any campaign ever, as it’s obviously not the intention behind these feats. But you could read it that way and that’s Jesses (paperthin) point. Besides: he finds the image of a barbarian running around recklessly smashing a crossbow over everyone’s head to just be hilarious.

58
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

jounniy

joined 9 months ago