jounniy

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As I said elsewhere, casting a spell and holding it uses visible components the hobgoblin could react to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I takes a minute because it's not meant to be used in combat. I think for the power it has in the situations it applies, its very reasonable that it would be a spell requiring prep time and not one to just be popped of in the middle of combat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If he doesn't know what spell you're casting, that means that he's even more likely to assume that you are trying to cast an harmful spell, making him attack you. And casting a spell takes an action, basically a third of your turn if you want, so the hobgoblin has at least 2 seconds to react, if not more. And thats plenty of time to stop himself from jumping.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Casting a spell and holding it uses visible components the hobgoblin could react to.

Incite greed also explicitly says that the creature avoids obvious harm while approaching you and does nothing beyond approaching you. If the would always run after the gem (forsaking personal safety to do so), this would be noted in the description.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assumed it to be about weird interpretations/effects of spell that are either Raw but stupid (like find traps finding intentional clauses in legal documents) or common sense interpretations that still lead to weird outcomes (using bead of force+levitate+thunderwave to blast the BBEG into orbit). Because why make a video about people misinterpreting spells without making clear that this is unintended?

28
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh. Yeah. But why afraid?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Not to worry. The Zenths tend to be pretty chill.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I still don't get the ,,would".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Okay. Maybe I'm outing myself as an idiot... but I don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago

"So what do you have? "

"A sword!"

"A sword?"

"Yes. And I can hit with it twice as often twice every hour."

"... I'll stick to my spellslots thank you."

"... It sounded better in my head."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I should be more like ,,is paralyzed when struck with a stake through the heart". But thats ruins the joke.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile I'm impressed by the fact, that Konsi used EXACTLY 25 words.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
136
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edit: A lot of people say, that GWM needs a melee weapon attack, but they miss Jesses point: While GWM requires a melee attack with a heavy weapon, Sharpshooters only criteria is an attack with a ranged weapon (not a ranged weapon attack). Jesse bases his claim on the fact, that a crossbow is still a ranged weapon, even if used as an improvised weapon for melee combat. That’s why it deals 1d4(!)+20 damage. (It works with any ranged, heavy weapon btw., so Longbow qualifies too.) Of course Jesse is playing the devils advocate here and of course, no somewhat sane Walter will allow this in any campaign ever, as it’s obviously not the intention behind these feats. But you could read it that way and that’s Jesses (paperthin) point. Besides: he finds the image of a barbarian running around recklessly smashing a crossbow over everyone’s head to just be hilarious.

 
view more: next ›