jj4211

agggggggggggggggg

He must have died while typing ...

Bread and circuses

I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child's privacy and safety, but in recent days it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so

Yeah, five months passed without anyone in the media caring about her or this baby. She got impatient and wanted to yell it from the rooftops whole blaming the media for the attention seeking behavior.

Take a few mg of mg

Note that it being only part of a key is a technology choice that does not require the reality map to it. It may seem like overkill, but someone may not trust the political process to preserve that promise and so they add the birthdate, just in case something goes sideway in the future. Lots of technical choices are made anticipating likely changes and problems and designing things to be extra robust in the face of those

Frankly the whole exchange sounds like Hollywood tech jargon.vaguely relevant words used in a not quite sensible way....

Do you really need pagent for that versus just ssh-agent?

I will say that it's super easy to say "someone else (not me) should assassinate these guys". I think that's the biggest gripe, that people are all too willing to volunteer other people to take the risks while themselves shying away. Either you personally are willing to take the advocated action or if you think "well for me, personally, the risk isn't worth it", well then maybe if it isn't worth the risk to you, you should not be advocating that it is worth the risk to others.

Frankly, not sure about that. There's a lot of money that got cut off, and no idea how many sorts of different farmer classes, or if even corp farms can weather the impact.

When we get to the growing season in california, we may have an insurmountable water supply problem owing to the stupid opening of dams, and money can't fix that even if the corps have it.

I did read the letter, the letter only describes a single bill. If there's a recurring impact, the letter fails to state what that recurring impact would be over what term. Reading the utility page, I'm still not sure. It sounds like there's some convoluted combination of energy credit funding specifically pertaining to heating, and a 'stopgap' credit was withdrawn but not the primary funding (yet). The utility page pegs the total value of the grants at $1 million, which doesn't jive with just one time $100 to only 250 people, so either there's some recurring impact, more people impacted, or it was only cancelled after $975,000 had already been paid out for this season and it was too late to claw back the rest. If that were the case then you might have a recurring $100 a year for 10,000 people. It's just hard to tell from the readily available sources.

Note that it says article (and headline) were updated. At the time the article just had the State department document about 400m in armored Tesla. Then after initial backlash the document was amended to say armored electric vehicles. Then eventually the Trump administration declared this was not a thing and to the extent it was a thing, it was Biden.

Now it could be as they say, but it is also the Trump administration, that isn't too big on the truth. So hard to say if this was a mishap about a misleading document, or something that was fired off without the broader approval of the PJ2025 folk and it getting killed after coming to light and needing a cover story as to why things didn't get close to as blatantly corrupt as it sounded.