Almost certainly not. It's common in some communities for people to write their own image transcriptions.
jagungal
joined 1 year ago
All of these things are only valuable if you do not have the technical expertise required to analyse the validity of the conclusions the authors draw from the methods.
This is a good video about who shouldn't be sharing pictures of their keys online: https://youtu.be/6mr-7hjItX0?si=zx8QnEX1P_QpTN8U. If you're a nobody who doesn't share pictures of their home you will probably be ok.
None of them, they all grow it in their backyards or harvest it in the wild
No, it's make everyone's quality of life better! /j
Given that he said he had no money for a funeral I'm guessing he was planning to pull her body out one day and go "oh my goodness, she's dead!" and have a funeral rather than just try to continue collecting her pension in perpetuity.
I doubt Trump's followers will think of this as a breach of their 2A rights. They will likely think that it's black people and bad actors who will have their guns taken for the safety of the boys in blue.
Connections
Puzzle #433
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
True, zip ties would also fit in that category
I'd go for jumpers, tape, and a tarp. Using the car battery makes it seem like your car battery died. Rope would also make it creepy.
I say "look it up". Applies to lots of forms of search, be it google, DDG, YouTube, Wikipedia, a dictionary, a manual, pretty much anything.
1 in 1000 year events are poorly named. One because it describes a likelihood, so this storm had a 0.1% chance of occurring in any given year, so we'd expect to see a storm like this once every thousand years on average. It's not cyclical. Two, the likelihood of these storms is steadily increasing and so it's probably no longer a 1 in 1000 year event.