This is poetry. I believe in us
I've played briefly on Linux mint with no tweaks required, on whatever default proton version.
hangonasecond
joined 1 year ago
Simon Hooper having a characteristically rubbish game tbh
He's old lol
Only right that theyre broadly undeserved, too
I'm not fine with it, only because we are still seeing offside calls so obviously against the spirit of the rules. I understand why it was offside but fuck me, 10 years ago the linesman does not make that call because there's no video to check. I also don't think the line was right, looked like they drew it in line with the defenders foot when his shoulder and hand might've put us onside.
It's calling them prostitutes that is incorrect. The kids are not sex workers.
Fwiw good quality canned tomatoes can be miles better than buying "fresh" tomatoes for the 8+ months of the year that they aren't actually in season (depending where you live in the world). Growers still grow them, but they're less sweet and less juicy. Canned tomatoes also break down way better for sauces. I agree with your overall point, and almost all of my fruit and veg come from farmers markets, but tomatoes generally don't for both cost and quality purposes.
Proton DB is the place to go. But I don't check 99% of games I play, unless it's going to be an expensive purchase and I want to check before I buy. I also don't bother with people's suggested tweaks on proton db unless I actually personally experience issues. The only game I've had to tweak so far has been cyberpunk 2077.
Edit: added context, I'm on 2 monitors and one of them is an ultrawide. Never had any issues that aren't similar to issues I've experienced on Windows in the past.
Are you buying collector items?
Conversely, taking a stance on that single issue would rule her out of doing any other aspect of her job. You're right, it's important, but more can be achieved by going along with it. If anything, these transphobic fucks might get a reality check when they realise they're sharing a bathroom with a fucking woman.
1, the comic is a joke, and 2, the author obviously doesn't believe the technology will exist imminently since the premise is what Elon has promised it will do, not the actual science and what is currently possible.
Stop giving the benefit of the doubt to somebody who has repeatedly and demonstrably lied about the capabilities of things they have a financial interest in. He has more money than God, in part in thanks to his deceit, he really doesn't need your help.
No time today to play around too long so I still need to work on filtering out names, and trying to adjust the shape isn't working properly.
I think this picture sends a really clear message though.
I still have a ways to go eliminating pointless words, but sensiblepuffin and Astrealix were absolutely correct that Fuck and Fucking feature very prominently.
Raya is up there too, with Kai. Does that mean Havertz was as good as Raya was poor?
I think I will exclude anything I recognise as a username in the next one, and I also want to add weighting for how many upvotes the comment the word came from got. I also want to make it look nicer - this is the default for the package I was using.
I feel pretty good about this for a first pass. Let me know what you guys think I can change.
view more: next ›
irrational numbers will always be out of reach for a finite set of dice. I think if you restrict the set to the rationals, you will still run into trouble because there's a finite number of dice and an infinite number of primes, so there will always be a big enough prime whose value you will be unable to get on the denominator. E.g. if you restrict to only a d2 and d3, you can't get a denominator of 5 for your probability. So add a d5. Now you can't get a denominator of 7, and so forth.
But all the primes would suffice especially as you've excluded 1 in the set. Otherwise, include a D1 and you're golden.
To be extra clear, if you have an infinite set of dice, one for each prime, then you can attain a given probability using a finite subset of those dice. If you allow for the use of infinite dice and infinite rolls, my intuition says you can get the whole interval but let's think about it.
It's true that every real can be expressed as a convergent sequence of rationals, and that between any two real numbers there is at least one rational number. You can use this to construct a sequence of rationals that approaches the real numbers we want in the interval, and because we have all the prime dice and I have (not rigorously) proved this is enough to get any rational, we can roll any probability in our sequence. So we can get as close as we like to the real number.