If you really think about it, he has never looked away from the image of himself in the mirror.
ghostBones
joined 1 year ago
Twitter and Reddit were both platforms for left leaning politics. I don't think it's a coincidence that they're both being basically dismantled before the next election.
Welcome to the internet
... where all monumental advances in technology are immediately sexualized and used for getting laid or viewing porn.
I don't recall Trump ever doing or saying anything without some element of egomaniacal pride, boasting, or grandstanding. He should get the opportunity to rot in a prison cell while endlessly showing up in court and being returned to said prison cell.
... and if you refuse to become a soulless ghoul then you become the merchandise.
My go-to for that was always a soft guitar pick with the tip cut off. It seems like this was applied buy a goon with a spoon.
There seems to be a long established pattern where Trump daydreams about irrefutable and overwhelming exoneration and then decides it should be true and tells everyone about it. Narcissists have a tendency to create shitstorms and then daydream about escapist fantasies to evade the consequences they always create for themselves.
There is no evidence for the decline you claim.
it was not a "claim".
Apologies if others knowing things you don't offends you.
Note that I have not engaged in ad hominem attacks, which seem to be the bulk of your response.
Here is a sample of what I won't be directly referencing for you. It took me less than 15 seconds to find.
There is a multitude of evidence that you are evidently completely unaware of.
Reference "beginner's guide to searching Google". It might prevent further embarrassment in the future.
I took this article specifically to mean, and that it was referring to, a new form of non-volatile solid state storage. Active memory is by definition, volatile. This article seems to be talking about non volatile RAM, fast enough to function as active RAM. This alone would redefine what a reboot is.
Yep, remembering wrong. Georgia was targeted because of a narrow race which made it a crucial battleground state. Why is that relevant? Well, it would not make sense to dispute the outcome in a state where it would not benefit. Qui bono. Who benefits? In this case, targeting Georgia would benefit Trump by being a bigger beneficial result, with the least amount of effort (easier to hide); because the vote count would be much closer. The legal question here is how did he try to win the benefit of victory in Georgia, after the election was over? Ex post facto means after the fact. Is there evidence that this effort was done in an illegal manner?
I know what lead poising does.
Then why do you need an easily searched reference?
Do you include yourself in this decline?
No.
I was not making a scientific assertion. I was making a comment.
I suggest referencing "comment".
That actually makes sense. It's plausible that it is strategic preemptive judge shopping. Success would create a protective precedent from the findings of a biased court. My reasoning is simple, if lots of the participants of the riot were charged with insurrection, then it logically follows that the person benefiting the most from the insurrection is likely guilty of it as well. The burden of proof should not be enormous to reach the top tier of that insurrection, because of public statements and suspicious neglect of duty to quietly support the effort. Things like wanting to remove magnetic weapon detectors to invite in armed insurrectionists should be a big clue.