eluvinar

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

like others have pointed out, this makes automatic detection easier not harder if true. Just cut the segments that move around, audio analysis and even transcripts (they don't have to be good! just good enough to identify missing segment!) are pretty mature.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

that's why we don't have couches or tables outside of USA. You just can't go buy them and there's no very easy and practical way around it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

It's somewhat based in reality, isn't it? I'm still gaming in my late 30s and most people I get to play with are on average 10-15 years younger than me. People leave the hobby with time, en masse, and almost no one my age seems to be joining. There are some games that let you ignore that more (single player, matchmaking. Although even in single player, what's the point of gaming, if you don't get to discuss it with most of your friends), but some are really difficult to continue playing (coop :().

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And aren't magic. Switching fully to renewables is probably both impossible (still require non-renewable materials to make) and requires lowering of living standards (unless you want to build a dyson swarm you need to stop growing your energy use, which pretty much means recession, because our economy is energy driven - and if you need a different economic system for a technological solution to work it's not really a technological solution, is it. Also renewables are still pretty annoying when it comes to matching your output to your supply, and not being able to turn your AC whenever you feel like it is already a lowering of living standard for the richest countries).

And while we wait for them to "solve" the problem, we're already likely past 1.5°C, even if we just stick to not starving, having water to drink, and not freezing during winters from tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think that's how it works. Plastic degrades fast (especially with UV radiation), it just doesn't fully go away. That's how we get microplastic and harmful chemicals everywhere.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

good thing no historic monuments/items were destroyed and your comment is completely off topic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

this is good, but I think we should build our own (illegal) stonehenge. Or maybe a pyramid. Not only it'd be nice to have something other than microplastic standing after the society collapse, it'd be a huge powerplay. As we seem to be wanting to join earlier civilizations that are no longer here (nor remembered that fondly) it seems only adequate.

My geographic area doesn't really have stone available, best I can do is a mound :(

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

And when you report it to the platform the moderators won't see anything that goes against said platform's code of conduct.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Policjantów rozumiem, że się czują bezkarni, ale jaki interes mają tam być strażacy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Większość dróg rowerowych chroni tylko 1 metr trawnika albo krawężnik, a pasów rowerowych linia z farby. Słupki jak sądzę głównie maja chronić przed parkowaniem, bo niewygodnie by było omijać zaparkowane nielegalnie auto wyjeżdżając pod prąd na jezdnię. Na moście obowiązuje 50 km/h, zaraz za słupkami są pasy i skrzyżowanie ze światłami, więc to nie jest żadna autostrada. Takie same zagrożenia dotyczą chodników. Bezpieczeństwo ruchu nie może się opierać na oddzieleniu wszystkich od wszystkich ścianą antyterrorystycznego betonu, bo nie damy ekonomicznie rady.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Z drugiej strony samorządowcy stawiają super mocne latarnie, by "poprawiać bezpieczeństwo na przejściach". Oczywiście realne zawalczenie o widoczność na przejściu przez usunięcie aut zasłaniających pieszych jest umiarkowanie popularne.

view more: next ›