efstajas

joined 10 months ago
[–] efstajas 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How do you know this? Of course there are lots of reasons for why they'd want to enforce minimum browser versions. But security might very well be one of them. Especially if you're a bank you probably feel bad about sending session tokens to a browser that potentially has known security vulnerabilities.

And sure, the user agent isn't a sure way to tell whether a browser is outdated, but in 95% of cases it's good enough, and people that know enough to understand the block shouldn't apply to them can bypass it easily anyway.

[–] efstajas 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I gotta say mRNA vaccines. It's not technically a 21st century invention, but much of the work to make them viable started in the early 2000s. The speed at which the COVID vaccine got developed and widely deployed was honestly incredible and a massive W for humanity. I remember thinking a vaccine would be years away.

[–] efstajas 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

There's no reason your clients can't have public, world routeable IPs as well as security.

There are a lot of valid reasons, other than security, for why you wouldn't want that though. You don't necessarily want to allow any client's activity to be traceable on an individual level, nor do you want to allow people to do things like count the number of clients at a particular location. Information like that is just unnecessary to expose, even if hiding it doesn't make anything more secure per se.

[–] efstajas -5 points 6 days ago

Is there some story I missed about his family being assholes?

[–] efstajas 12 points 6 days ago

I do think it's a problem when 100% of people seeing "made with AI" will assume the entire thing is AI-generated, even if all you did was use AI for a minor touch-up. If it's really that trigger happy right now, I think it'd make sense for it to be dialled down a bit.

[–] efstajas 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

simply reading the browser agent isnt really security

It's not for their security, but for that of genuinely clueless people that are just running an actually outdated browser that might have known and exploitable security flaws.

[–] efstajas 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They sell AirTag location data? I honestly find that hard to believe. What's your source on this other than big tech bad?

[–] efstajas 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's a feature on stock android. Should be in most android flavors

[–] efstajas 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol that's ridiculous. There's nothing about ipv6 that'd make it any slower

[–] efstajas 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oof, that quote is the exact brand of nerd bullshit that makes my blood boil. "Sure, it may be horribly designed, complicated, hard to understand, unnecessarily dangerous and / or extremely misleading, but you have nOT rEAd ThE dOCUmeNtATiON, therefore it's your fault and I'm immune to your criticism". Except this instance is even worse than that, because the documentation for that command sounds just as innocent as the command itself. But I guess obviously something called "tmpfiles" is responsible for your home folder, how couldn't you know that?

[–] efstajas 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Smoke is easy to add in post. Muzzle flash is a little bit harder but also of course very possible.

[–] efstajas 8 points 1 week ago

Good for you. The tweet is just a joke though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›