chetradley

joined 2 years ago
[–] chetradley 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but as you can see, growing plants to feed animals and raising them is a very inefficient use of land.

[–] chetradley 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Well, livestock are definitely a major source of animal contact outbreaks, but I do agree with you that wild animals displaced from their environment as a result of land use change is a factor as well.

And what is the biggest contributing factor in land use? Oh, it's animal agriculture again...

[–] chetradley 28 points 7 months ago (9 children)

The definition I've heard the most is: newborn (0-3 mo.), infant (3-12ish mo, toddler (from the time they start walking to between about 2-3 years). Technically, any of them could be considered a baby.

"Toddler" describes the action of toddling, or walking in an uncoordinated way.

[–] chetradley 8 points 7 months ago

I remember an article where someone asked the developer, Billy Basso, why the PS5 version of the game was over double the file size, and he said it's probably because the banner image that displays for the game was probably a bigger file than the game itself.

[–] chetradley 29 points 8 months ago (16 children)

He claims to not support Trump, but seems to defend him all the time:

He recently defended Trump regarding the trial verdict: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-barack-obama-joe-rogan-tony-hinchcliffe-podcast-1909438

He defended Trump to Bill Maher on his podcast: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/joe-rogan-bill-maher-trump-biden-1235581529/

Said Joe Biden is mentally unfit while citing something that Trump actually said: https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/joe-rogan-fact-checked-biden-trump-revolutionary-war-airports-1235849684/

He even said he would vote for Trump over Biden in 2020: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/04/joe-rogan-donald-trump-joe-biden-bernie-sanders

[–] chetradley 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

STAR, or Score Then Automatic Runoff, differs from RCV in that instead of ranking the candidates in order of preference, you can assign a rating to each, out of five stars. All of the stars are added for each candidate (score), and the ones with the fewest stars are eliminated (automatic runoff), then the scores are added again, another runoff, etc.

So say you love candidate C, you dislike candidate B, and you hate candidate A.

  • In an RCV system, you'd rank C,B,A, and if C is eliminated, your full support goes behind B, but in the initial scoring round, only your top ranked candidate gets your full vote.
  • In a STAR system, you'd maybe give C five stars, B two stars, and A zero stars. You're still giving some support to B for the initial scoring round, but most of your support goes to C.

So the biggest difference is that in the initial scoring round, your preference for candidates other than your first choice are considered. Check out this video, which gives a good breakdown of voting systems and how they account for spoilage: https://youtu.be/oFqV2OtJOOg?si=8sLYiYpA7EnOt94i

[–] chetradley 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I learned a lot about home maintenance and handiwork from my dad, but then I started looking stuff up and realized he's been stubbornly doing a lot of projects the wrong way.

[–] chetradley 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm a fan of STAR voting myself, but anything is better than the first past the post system we have now.

[–] chetradley 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why you think the sea salty?

[–] chetradley 1 points 8 months ago

What do you want

Anarchy

[–] chetradley 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so it's an AI episode, but like instead of an actual AI it's a prosthetic eye that tries to steal your job and makes pictures of people with weird hands. It's an "a-eye", get it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›