bouh

Hiding behind laws and words. You're the best support to fascism there can be.

I don't care about laws and stuff. There wasn't any need for anything for US and EU to support Ukraine. There wasn't any need for investigation to send a war fleet in the red see to protect the merchant ships against the houti. And there wasn't any investigation before Israel sent its army to raze Gaza.

Your technicalities are irrelevant. And you pretending its more important than 2 million people dying is literal evil.

What is there to investigate when Israel is litteraly sieging Gaza? Oh yes, Egypt is accomplice too, because they also have a border. Still, they are starving the population, there's nothing to investigate there. EU and US gave full support to Israel, nothing to investigate either, it's straight fact. US is vetoing anything the UN want to do. That's fact too. What do you want to investigate?

Are you pretending that what's happening in Palestine is fine? Is this what you're saying?

If that's the case, you are litteraly a monster with no care whatsoever for human lives.

My point is the exact opposite. The smiley face is to point the hypocrisy of making the loss of 3 abrams something meaningful when Russia lost far, far more.

The whole UN is saying it. The only one denying it are Israel and its direct supports : US and EU. And even in the EU countries are calling for moderation and help corridors. Even the US is mounting an operation to bring food by boat in Palestine because Israel is going to starve them all to death.

Right now you must be blind and deaf to ignore the dying of the people of Palestine. That or you are a fascist who doesn't care about genocide.

That's blatantly wrong. If you see articles supporting Palestine these days, it's because there's an actual genocide supported by the US and Europe there.

What proportions of its planes did Russia lost? Of its warships? Of its tanks? :-)

In France there are two turns for the president election. The first turn usually has many parties, but because there are only two in the second turn, the first vote is often tactical. You vote for the one you prefer that you think has a chance at the second turn. This means there are a lot of negociations before the election between the parties, alliances and formation of large parties. The left is often divided, and thus often lose.

But there is a second election for the parliament. Unfortunately it's still a vote for one person over two turns, but it's regionalized, so depending on the demographics it can change.

So the situation is not as dire in France I'd say. The right is still liberal in France and not yet fully fascist. And even if we had a far right president, there would be another round for the parliament where the far right showed it's complete incompetency.

The problem today is that the liberals think they can play with the fire and get away with it. And that they are slowly turning fascist themselves. They must come back to talking with the left rather than with the far right.

So indeed we must talk to the liberals at some point, but in my opinion they must lose the power first to get back to reason, and they must do it before our democracy is too weak for it to be dangerous in the hands of the far right.

If what you're telling me is right, the fight to save the US was lost like 20 years ago. Now you're left scooping the flood. The real problem is that the republican party is rotten to the core, that money matters, and media are used for propaganda. Will any of this be worked on in the next term? I doubt it. So in 4 years will it be back to square 1?

We're talking about history where mysoginy left a big footprint because it was made by men that incapable of thinking that women could be more than what they were in their time.

Exactly like today. You're asking why it matters whether it was a man or a woman, yet this whole conversation sparked because someone said that it could be a woman.

That's conservatism for you.

You are ignorant of recent history then.

Men did do their best to segregate women in the 18th and 19th century. And they succeeded. Even in the language.

Women fighting for women to be recognized in history is an important fight for women to be respected and recognized for their doing, because even now they aren't.

And I'm not saying it's an all men problem. It's a society problem.