bisby

joined 2 years ago
[–] bisby 14 points 8 months ago

Streamers use a capture device to stream on a second computer, with an extra GPU so the stream doesn't interfere with their gaming performance. Don't want stream encoding to hurt your framerate.

I've never heard of anyone using a multiple device setup for internet bandwidth reasons (im sure its happened, but I would have to believe it's generally not the reason people use multiple devices)

[–] bisby 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

... What exactly do you need the Elgato for? All the Elgato does is capture external HDMI signals.

If you had 2 PCs, you would use the Elgato to send the gaming PC's screen to the streaming PC. If you had an Xbox, you would use it to capture the Xbox's screen on your PC for streaming.

If you have 1 PC, you don't need an Elgato, KDE already knows what your PC screen looks like, it is laying it out.

What you should be doing is just "open OBS and set up your scenes and start streaming." The only thing you might want to do is go into the video settings and set it to use NVENC (I think you can do that on Linux) to offload the encoding to your GPU (which has dedicated encoding hardware) instead of your CPU.

Everything else should just work the same as it does on Windows.

To be clear: The Elgato HD60 X does not do any streaming.. it is a video capture device. OBS does all the streaming, and it already has access to all the things it needs to capture by nature of being on the PC. You can just capture your desktop in OBS without the Elgato.

[–] bisby 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have a few cheap TLDs because as an individual I didn't want to pay a lot of money for the dot com versions. But I'm not a company.

[–] bisby 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

An epoch is a geological age and not a specific time span. So "65-145 Mya" (million years ago) would be the appropriate label. I can't seem to find a label for "million years" (other than megaannum, which is just an SI prefix for years, but I don't think Ive ever heard that used?)

[–] bisby 18 points 8 months ago

It is a bot trained to specifically replicate human mistakes to be more convincingly human. "p" and "o" are right next to each other on a qwerty keyboard and an easy "I accidentally pressed 2 keys" and then it got the space between the wrong characters as humans do when typing too fast. "oh ok cool" would have looked too clean and made you guess it was a bot. It fooles you, so task successful.

[–] bisby 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're right. There are multiple definitions of the word stable, and "unchanging" is a valid one of them.

It's just that every where else I've seen it in computing, it refers to a build of something being not-crashy enough to actually ship. "Can't be knocked over" sort of stability. And everyone I've ever talked to outside of Lemmy has assumed that was what "stable" meant to Debian. but it doesn't. It just means "versions won't change so you won't have version compatibility issues, but you'll also be left with several month to year old software that wasn't even up to date when this version released, but at least you don't have to think about the compatibility issues!"

[–] bisby 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Debian aims for rock solid stability

To be clear, Debian "stability" refers to "unchanging packages", not "doesn't crash." Debian would rather ship a known bug for a year than update the package if it's not explicitly a security bug (and then only certain packages).

So if you have a crash in Debian, you will always have that crash until the next version of debian a year or so from now. That's not what I'd consider "stable" but rather "consistent"

[–] bisby 1 points 8 months ago

It's a nice tool to have around anyway. Even for my windows VR PC. The power at my house went out yesterday and the base stations restarted into a fully on state. I didn't have to turn on the VR PC to turn them back off, just had to open Lighthouse PM.

[–] bisby 5 points 8 months ago

You're right, it's very likely he wasn't intending to use a slur. But it seems to me like a lot of the reporting is "he didn't mean to disrespect people!" when that's not the case. The pope's intentions were absolutely to disrespect people, just by his actions, and not by that specific word. the specific phrasing he used to do so doesn't really matter.

[–] bisby 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

the pope had made the remark while reiterating his position against gay people becoming priests.

It doesn't matter what word he used, he was using it in an anti LGBT sentiment.

The 87-year-old pontiff was reported as saying that the Catholic seminaries were already too full of .. gay men.

Here, I removed the slur. This isn't any better. Italian fluency wasn't the problem and didn't change his argument.

[–] bisby 154 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

I hate how these things always come up because "order of operations!" It's mostly people who are bad at math remembering one topic they struggled with and finally got right, and now they know it's a touchy subject so it will drive engagement. It's the modern equivalent of "Mathematicians hate this one secret for solving equations! Click to find out!" Pure engagement bait.

But in all the engineering ive done, things never really come up like this. If there is any potential clarity issues, parentheses would be used, or it would be formatted in a way that makes it much more clear.

40 - (32/2), or 40 - ³²⁄₂ has no clarity issues imo. You don't even have to think about order of operations because 32 halves is a number on its own. it isn't an "operation" to do necessarily, it's a fraction to reduce.

And yes, I get the joke. The joke is making fun of the engagement bait of "some people will get the order of operations wrong!"

The joke(40 - 32)/2 = 4

If you stop here, you used the wrong order of operations. This is where the the fights normally start in the replies.

but the kid said "4!" not "4"

40 - (32/2) = 24 = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 4!

[–] bisby 5 points 8 months ago

A ticket while "traveling". Driving is something you need a license for, but they weren't doing that because magic words. Most of this is them justifying that they weren't driving because there is a difference between capitalized words and not, so they don't need a license to travel, but they got a ticket for it anyway, so they want justice.

And then yes, they think you can just declare a $5 million countersuit and win by default, as part of the "I'm so smart, you can't counter my flawless logic" delusion

view more: ‹ prev next ›