So long as you can pay. If you can't pay they will repo it and sell it again and you'll still owe. They used to do this with payday loans to buy vehicles outside military bases. We were all warned against them at the start but young service members still tried to buy vehicles from them occasionally. I even know a guy who used to install kill switches in them so they could repo the cars easier or disable them if you didn't pay. Payday loans are scammy as hell.
atrielienz
joined 1 year ago
I think I just don't know how to do anything yet and it's confusing trying to figure out the controls because the game doesn't tell you which buttons to press at the start to interact with inventory and so on.
I just started and I am so confused about everything. Playing on console makes me wish I had a keyboard.
The point is to prevent the detrimental effects to the mental health of teens and preteens. That doesn't work unless you plug the holes. That's the problem. Fallacy in argument or no fallacy.
The point we're trying to make isn't that we don't want the restriction. We just understand that it's not going to work specifically because it requires the same thing the under 13 privacy laws already include. Companies to comply (which they will, probably with detriments to legal users), and that parents be involved in what their children are doing online and restrict that accordingly to comply with the law (which we already know they aren't).
I as a full grown adult am not willing to provide my details (picture of a government issued ID or similar) to most online entities. I certainly won't ever be giving it to social media or a porn site of any kind. But that's what's going to end up being required to enact this law and make it enforceable. Is the law going to fine parents whose children aren't in compliance? Is it going to fine businesses for not enacting enough restrictions? Is it going to outlaw VPN's for use on social media?
Where is the burden of proof and who's privacy gets invaded in order to enforce the law?
I was not (in my original comment or any subsequent ones in the thread) intending people to take this as "we shouldn't do this because XYZ". And I am aware that you weren't responding to me. I was saying that it's going to be problematic to enforce and isn't likely to have the results intended.
It's not about the handful of people per hundred who commit a murder. Because murder being illegal isn't a deterrent and we have scientific studies to back that up. It's about how 75-85% of teens will find a way to circumvent the law because they don't understand the dangers and parents aren't doing their part. So the rest of us will have to jump through hoops to use any social media.
If 75% or more of people the law effects aren't following the law, the law doesn't do what is intended and is going to have to be reworked.
The thing about kids getting a VPN, free or paid is that it will spread like wild fire. It only takes one kid who knows how to do something. They tried this at my highschool, blocking websites and such. That was more than 20 years ago and we knew how to use VPN's or similar then and once we figured it out it was an open secret.
I'm not saying the law shouldn't exist or that we should do nothing. I'm saying that this isn't going to be effective as it is and could end up leading to worse things.
Probably going to get downvoted for this, but this just makes kids look for VPN's and other ways to skirt this restriction. It may make VPN's less useful for the rest of us as a result when certain services are forced to comply with the law, breaking those services for those of us using VPN's. It sounds like a great idea but I don't know that the implementation will make a noticeable or effective difference.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer company.
Agreed. I managed the first two stages of the Colosseum. Then I died there repeatedly so I got tired and went to explore other parts of the game. I am replaying the game now on steam (I previously completed the first ending on Switch), and so I may decide to try again. But I'm just not that bothered. The pantheon seems interesting to me but not enough to really go there and die repeatedly doing it. Maybe one or two of the boss fights I would play again but I don't view most of them as extremely enjoyable so probably not.
Late game is expected to be difficult. Nine Sols kind of sets you up to either get good at that parry mechanic or rage quit and the rest of the move set is kind of built around it. Hollow Knight teaches you to pogo and juggle in kind of round about ways, and it doesn't force you to use those mechanics in battle despite the fact that when you do things get a lot easier. That's part of the reason that the late stages of the game are so brutal. You spend so much time learning to evade and then strike, the pogo, to juggle. And then a lot of that moveset is just not applicable (to the colosseum, or the final boss fight (final ending) etc. The mechanics you get in late game you have the least amount of playtime with and they're crucial to learn for the final boss.
That doesn't work for me on Lemmy because in the app I use it doesn't sort comments that way. So I see the comments basically newest first. This is reddit behavior is what it is.