atomicpoet

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago (1 children)

Let's be real. What OP really wants is for a certain moderator to not have power on a server she deems as influential. Thus, she's trying to leverage peer pressure in order to make that happen.

But the moderator can join any server or create her own as well. So trying to remove her perceived influence is basically playing whack-a-mole, and because she herself doesn't run any servers, peer pressure is an ineffective tool.

So if the moderator is that objectionable, the reasonable thing to do is either:

  1. block the moderator
  2. block all communities the moderator runs
  3. block LW

If neither of these options have the desired results, then I'm sorry -- that's just life.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 24 minutes ago (3 children)

OP's problem is with LW allowing a certain person they don't like to become moderator of the server. They could block the user, but their issue is that the specific user has power in an LW community.

If OP doesn't like that, and feels like that moderators presence is a non-negotiable, she has options.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

You don't need to wait on Mastodon to do it.

Obviously, I'm not talking about you specifically -- Threadiverse devs generally.

For example, some of this functionality already exists on Friendica.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Right now, you can crosspost to a Friendica group by mentioning the group actor handle (ex: @[email protected]. And because Friendica supports quoted boosts, you can boost to a Friendica group through this method.

Lemmy could easily support this feature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

I'm not saying that everyone should block LW. I'm saying that if one has an ethical objection to LW, it's on them to block the server. If they don't want to block the server because of its size, then it's also on them to either promote alternatives to LW or build your own.

No server on the Fediverse should is too big for blocking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm not suggesting that you sell your DIY GOG package to someone else. I'm suggesting you do that for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

It really would be so much easier to just boost Mastodon posts into a Lemmy community.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

On every retrogaming forum I’ve ever been on, this has been a topic and it’s been a topic for at least 15 years. A few practical bits of advice:

  1. The cheapest games will always be last generations games
  2. Anything not deemed “retro” yet is cheap
  3. Nintendo is always super expensive unless it’s Wii or handheld
  4. Anything Xbox is cheap
  5. PC is cheap, unless it’s big box, but even then sellers will sell big box for cheap because they often don’t know what they have
  6. There’s nothing wrong with buying from GOG, burning to disc, and making your own labels and box art—which is easy to do because it’s DRM-free
  7. Except for PS1, Sony is cheap. But even then PS1 is cheaper than N64 or Saturn.
  8. Nothing wrong with an Everdrive, especially since that’s the best way to play aftermarket games
[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

The only thing I do with DeepSeek is argue communism with it. When I ask it why everyone isn’t a member of the communist party, it tells me the servers are busy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

OP, sounds like the solution for you is to join another server and block lemmy.world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

I’ll always update posts about Jerry Lawson. The Fairchild Channel F was truly revolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Cults aren’t isolated by others. They self-isolate.

 

Now, why is it super unlikely that you’ve played this game? Because it was only ever released in arcades. And it wasn’t exactly a huge runaway success. But in terms of actual gameplay mechanics, this game had some monumental firsts.

 
 

r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

view more: next ›