Listing off 2 items doesn't answer my question, but not flat rejecting pedophilia tells me all I need.
Nor do you seem to know what FGM is in the first place. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
Listing off 2 items doesn't answer my question, but not flat rejecting pedophilia tells me all I need.
Nor do you seem to know what FGM is in the first place. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
There very much are things that are black and white, I think the majority would consider animal torture as black and white.
If nothing is black and white and context matters, could you please provide your take on when female genital mutilation is sometimes okay? Or when rape or pedophilia are okay in certain circumstances?
Bro, what? You're okay with animal torture?
We're talking about torture if an animal doing nothing except what it was born to do.
Torture of an animal has zero place in normality. Dispatching an animal that threatens your family or pets as a means to protect is one thing, torture is not acceptable under any circumstances.
Thanks, I think more people need to try approaching things like this and see how word substitution sounds.
Yeah, I'm not ruling out Israel unknowingly killing their own (or even knowingly I guess) but I think regardless if an explanation (that's true) by either was possible, it'd be better.
Problem I think is why they don't have them now if they had them at some point.
Unless they never had them to begin with; having people and now no longer having them points to killing them which, surprise, hurts negotiation.
Who knows though, Israel might of taken them for innocent Palestinians and did it to themselves :(
Fair enough, no problem.
Weird, I don't take it as gleeful?
It's got a tone of "O RLY?" Because hamas bit off more than they could chew.
No one's happy.
Top left, if Harold fights dirty I know he got those pointy teeth behind that smile.
Nah, how else will Republicans cry that solar energy is bad, and that we need coal and oil?
Ah, fair enough, thank you.
I personally dont think we're close to fox total domestication however. It seems like we've selective breed a human friendly temperament but there's more to it than that for the sake of pet-ness that I'm sure people like to have. That is the main point in my OP. They love to mark, burrow into furniture and cause other problems. Those issues I think will be harder to alter than temperament. Probably not in my lifetime or most of ours in my opinion.
You didnt answer the question in the first place. I asked your take on them, instead you provided 2 nouns as a response.