Alright man, so you are making crap arguments while cherry picking the parts of my comment you are responding to.
You don't need to be a congressional historian to understand why the Democrats haven't ended Citizens United. The real answer comes down to money and lobbying influencing their politics, as well as the filibuster stopping them the few times they have tried, such as when Bernie did in 2014. That would have been an actually valuable point that we could have discussions about.
Instead, you're too focused on belittling and insulting me to actually make a valid argument.
I could break down and respond to every convenient point in your comment and act like a petty little cunt too, but really it comes down to this
Should the Democrats have been railing about campaign reform at every speech from the moment the SCOTUS inflicted it on us? Yes. Yes they should.
This is pretty much my whole point.
See, this is actually a good point.