WrenFeathers

What’re makes you feel better! Take care now!

Who’s Angela? And why is this now suddenly about the holocaust?

Seriously… take away your false equations and you really have nothing. You probably need to learn how to argue a point if you’re going to barge into discussions in defense of things you seem to have no defense for, or wasn’t even asked for to begin with.

And since you are here for no other reason than to argue- that means you have no dog in this race, and therefore- I’m disqualifying you from it.

And thanks for correcting me on the tag. I’ve updated it to just: “Blowhard.”

Now. I’ll unblock you when I feel you’ve had enough time to understand the original point I was making, and how you’ve done nothing but prove it this entire time.

Doing X is legal.
Person Y has no place telling someone they shouldn’t do X.
Person Y is more then welcome to make the information publicly known and available to anyone that partakes in doing X
Person X is under no obligation to look at said information if they don’t wish to.
Person Y should leave person X alone to live their life without constant harassment from person Y.
Person Y probably doesn’t like others telling them how to live their lives, what they should put in their bodies, who they should marry, love, or live with.
Person Y should note the irony in this.
Person Y should spend their time in support of others that share the same belief than antagonizing those that don’t.

I didn’t read the rest of your wall of text as I have said time and again here that I refuse to argue about it. You all have zero respect for others wishes- I no longer have any for yours. I’ve tagged you as “vegan blowhard” so I’ll now know not to engage with you in the future.

Oh, and congrats! You pushed someone further away from your cause.

Yet another false equivalency. Thanks for playing. Not wasting my time.

"Lets care less about who others kill?"

What, not who. And someone choosing to eat meat has nothing to do with whether or not you care. It’s about whether or not you have the right to tell them they shouldn’t when they DIDN’T ASK YOU.

This is a false equivalence because you’re equating something that is not equal to the argument presented.

"Lets care less about who others spit on?"

No one is talking about spitting on anyone, or being spit on by anyone.

This is a false equivalence because in this discussion, animals aren’t spit, nor are they being spit on, nor are they spitting on anyone. In addition to it being false equivalence- it’s downright nonsense.

"Lets care less about when your neighbors blast their music at 130dB"

No one is talking about music. Animals aren’t music. Animals aren’t playing music. No one is playing music. My neighbors have nothing to do with this.

This is a false equivalence because you’re equating something that is not equal to the argument presented.

And if none of these are false equivalencies. Then I’m the very least- they’re ALL straw men. And that’s by definition- arguing in bad faith. Which is apparently, the only way you can discuss the topic.

Blocking you now as I have wasted enough of my time, but trust me when I say this- I am now no longer neutral on the topic. I will no longer waste my time defending veganism in any conversation that illustrates them in a negative light as you all have proven you don’t deserve the time wasted in doing so.

Apology accepted. And thanks for proving my point. You can’t leave people alone and you feel that you’re entitled to tell others what to eat based on your own personal belief regardless if they ask you for your opinion.

You are literally the quintessential obnoxious vegan that people talk about- that I used to defend.

Enjoy your evening.

If one considers the act immoral, yet said act is legal- then one has no business telling the person that they shouldn’t do said act. It’s not their business regardless of what it is.

Child abuse doesn’t apply here.
Rape doesn’t apply here.
Apples don’t apply here.
Oranges don’t apply here.

It’s about food. And it’s only considered immoral by those that believe that it is. And that belief is not an obligation to anyone.

And if I need any further proof to my point, look no further than the responses to my original comment. I’m getting hammered by people telling me I’m wrong and comparing the eating of meat to rape.

This was the exact point I made in my original comment. People need to stay out of the decisions of others. It’s not their business.

I’m done with this discussion now.

No.

Yet another false equivalency. You can’t stop, can you?

Are you people capable of arguing without using false equivalencies?

I made my point that people shouldn’t tell others what to do with their diets, and you’re here to be a perfect example of my point.

Thanks?

But like I told the other person doing the same thing, I don’t argue with people who bring false equivalence to a conversation to derail the meaning of my own point.

Enjoy your evening.

Would you make the same comment if somebody else was eating a human child? If not, why?

No, I would not. Why? Because we’re not talking about human children.

Now. Im done discussing this with you. Enduring two back-to-back attempts to argue in bad faith using false equivalencies is my limit.

I simply wanted to state my point that people should be free to make their own decisions on what they want to eat without being harassed, and you came in to be the perfect shining example of my point.

I see no other purpose in continuing this, ending it here.

If you’re using “travel and learn” as a way to illustrate the idea that this is what allowed you to arrive at your point that raw milk is safe, It’s clearly ineffective advice.

I’m going to kindly ask that you stop with the misinformation.