TwilightVulpine

joined 2 years ago
[–] TwilightVulpine 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe but it would also be immensely more time consuming. Why not use AI to accelerate the process?

[–] TwilightVulpine 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's just as much game killing than any live service today. Satellaview relied on server connection, there's no official lasting copies that anyone can own.

[–] TwilightVulpine 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Media today might be less sexist but I think part of it is also that it became drastically more sex averse. Mortal Kombat is gorier than ever for anyone to see, but god forbid anything shows a nipple.

[–] TwilightVulpine 3 points 10 months ago

People used to bring up Kratos in these discussions but before these new games he seemed far more likely to bite someone's face off than to kiss anyone. There's a difference.

[–] TwilightVulpine 5 points 10 months ago

I think there is space for both sexualized and non-sexualized characters, as long as they are treated evenly. This is entertainment, they don't need to be all business serious.

I dread that in trying to be perfectly respectable, the medium might err to the side of prudishness and sexual repression.

[–] TwilightVulpine 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but that is just another facet of marketing for men. Sexy dress-up vs tighty whities. Definitely not intended to get women interested.

[–] TwilightVulpine 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Worth considering that if Alien was produced today, there would be a lot of criticism of it being "too woke". Not only progress doesn't just happen, but it's also not granted to stick unless people are still pushing for it.

[–] TwilightVulpine 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I straight up do not believe that a company can provide a service for over a decade and not be charging enough to be sustainable. The CEO can come and say this to my face and I'll call them a LIAR. One or a couple years I could buy the idea of investors holding it up for the sake of establishing the business, but why would they be accepting losses for such a long time? This is funky accounting. I'm more inclined to think "it was not sustainable, we need to charge more" is just something they say when they think they can get away with squeezing more money from customers.

[–] TwilightVulpine 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These people want to be rid of Google's influence, which is why they chose Firefox over Chrome to begin with. But they don't understand the position Mozilla is in..

[–] TwilightVulpine 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Streaming services are paid and they are enshittifying just as fast as anything else, if not faster. No, it's not that we aren't paying enough and this is a desperate measure to make up for our neglect. This is corporate greed. Even when they have sustainable business models, that isn't enough.

Also, I worry how societal inequality might increase if the whole internet becomes subscription based, if people can't get informed or communicate without paying (more than their internet service, even)

[–] TwilightVulpine 5 points 10 months ago

Anime fans could figure it out before them and they can do the same after them.

[–] TwilightVulpine 1 points 10 months ago

They were kind of a Kant

view more: ‹ prev next ›