TotesIllegit

joined 1 year ago
[–] TotesIllegit 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they're viable samples, it would be probably be possible as soon as it's people can have their contemporary eggs and sperm used in a fully artificial gestation process.

I wasn't talking at all about overpopulation because it wasn't directly related to your comment about bullying. I don't think we have an overpopulation problem so much as a resource distribution problem and lack of political will among those with power to actually change our systems into something less cruel to ourselves and the planet. We produce far more than we need to in our current system for the population we have, but our resource distribution system is directed by the whims of market forces and profit instead of community need.

Plus, I tend to automatically reject the assumption we're overpopulated because bringing it up gives off an implication that it needs to be intentionally resolved, and that gets into really horrific territory really quickly.

On top of that, nobody even knows what the human carrying capacity of the planet even is; there's zero scientific consensus on total human capacity or how to even measure it. It's a non-starter for me, and I just do not think it's an issue worth worrying about, but I am deeply concerned with how quick people are to blame everything on overpopulation as the cause of shortages when we haven't really tried a different approach.

Edit: I fixed the last sentence to make sense.

[–] TotesIllegit 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would anybody find out? The kid would only ever really need to know at a young age (where they might out themselves without Knowing the social risks) if they had ongoing medical needs from complications resulting from it. Plus, it's an artificial womb, not cloning; the kid would still have two genetic parents who would be their actual legal guardians, unless life happened and the kid lost one or both of them, which would just mean the bullying would focus on that instead.

[–] TotesIllegit 12 points 1 year ago

This sounds like it would mean charging Valve money for the privilege of using Valve's own infrastructure every time a player installed a Unity game after a major PC upgrade/reinstall or after uninstalling that MMO they dumped every other game in their library try out.

Steam could probably bake a ban on software that uses installation trackers into their developer/publisher ToS, or ban the collection or transmission of Steam user data related to installations, or something similar.

[–] TotesIllegit 6 points 1 year ago

I'm in my 30s and just played a 15-year-old fan remake of the first episode of Doom, which itself came out in 1993. Yesterday, I just started playing a fan demake of that remake which was released November of 2022. I've also waited over a decade for Skyblivion, and waited for the FF7 remake to hit PCs before playing.

It gets easier to wait when you feel time pass by faster, and sometimes oldies act as comfort food.

view more: ‹ prev next ›