He knows he's lost the case, and has nothing left to lose. He might as well try to make the whole thing political. He's backed in ca corner & his only hope is to become president again. (Notice I didn't say win the election. Winning would be great, but the means is unimportant to him)
TheWoozy
joined 2 years ago
The problem with the SCOTUS avoiding responsibility on the issue is that it will up to each state to decide whether he should be on the ballet. Only blue states will abide by the constitution and keep him off. It won't make a difference to the outcome, but it will feed the magats accusations of a rigged election.
Looks like Roger Stone to me. Not cool.
I'm pretty sure an acre was originally defined as the area of land that a medieval peasant could plow in one day.
There. I'm glad that's all cleared up.
"Bill O'Reilly", That's a name I haven't heard in a long time. TIL: he's still alive.
I remember when right on red was first implemented. The purpose was to save on fuel during the energy crisis back in the 70s/80s. It's saves some huge amount of green house gasses. A lot of localities spent a fortune on "no right on red" signs.
Theoretically, right on red is a good thing, but theoretically, everybody follows the rules and nobody makes mistakes.
Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't.
I know it's the wrong candy