Steve

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
abq
[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mortonksalt linked to instructions.

They say you should be able to put the linked URI into your instance search and pull up the local version of the same post. That isn't super clean, but it should work.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There isn't a way to do exactly what you want.

Since you typically do this with your partner, the easiest solution would be for you both to be on the same instance. Then the gray chain link would work fine.

For other random people, use the colored federation star link. That goes to the home instance of the post.

Edit: as per mortonksalt
Another option is to paste the link to another instance into the search on yours. That should bring up the local instance version of the same post.

[–] Steve 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't think it is. Loading multiple images in the body seems ideal.

[–] Steve 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I pay for:

  • eMail, Cloud storage, VPN (Proton)
  • Search (Kagi)
  • Anything that takes away advertisements if I do. I loathe ads.
[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago

The chain link is what you want. That does exactly what you're looking for. Not sure why the 404. Some kind of bug.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me put it another way.

When you want to bookmark the link, or open annother tab to view the thread yourself, you want use the grey chain link.

When you want to share a link publicly, or give it to some random you don't know, the colored network link is probably more appropriate.

[–] Steve 17 points 1 year ago

Because manufacturing the physical copy is a very small part of the expense in creating the game. It also has no practical effect on a players enjoyment or likeliness to purchase the game.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The grey chain icon, goes to the post or comment address on your instance.

The colored federation icon, goes to the home instance address of the community the post or comment is part of.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago

That's true, but it's still a lot less than 8000 subs.

[–] Steve 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The basic calorie in/out concept always struck me as obviously too simple.

When I found out that the way we determined how many calories was in a given food ingredient, was by actually burning it and measuring the energy output, I knew whole concept was flawed. Our bodies simply don't "burn" food like that. We don't shit ash. There can't be a simple 1:1 correlation.

[–] Steve 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get it. If I was looking at that seating chart, I'd be thinking:
"Screw it. If I have to sit in the front, I'm going to sit in The front."

[–] Steve 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

They don't need to take over all of them. A dozen or two of the largest subs would be plenty. Those with less than a couple hundred thousand subscribers, don't really matter much.

view more: ‹ prev next ›