SolarTapestryofNoise

joined 1 year ago
[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Goes into the budget is my understanding. It becomes departmental funds.

Very very poorly for the individual because your intent cannot be factored into the case. The money itself has to be proven innocent from criminal activity. It's essentially designed to be as hard as possible for the individual to get their money back. I am not a lawyer and I am pulling this from memory so i could be wildly off base with this.

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 17 points 1 month ago (11 children)

The police department gets it. If you want your money back it's the seized money vs the state in a court, not you personally vs the state, the money itself vs the state.

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 3 points 1 month ago

Yes. Mostly because it would "validate" extremely thinly veiled sexism.

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 2 points 4 months ago

Not sure if it's there anymore, but there used to be a tank or other armored vehicle out front

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yep. Andrew Clyde is a fuckin asshole and always has been. He owns a gun store that he made look like a fortress and it's half the reason anyone even voted for him.

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But what genre? My money would be on either garage Ska-punk or folksey Americana

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 38 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Cause sky daddy "told" them to.

Don't you dare point out that sky daddy's son said the opposite and hung out with whores, poors, and the sick with sores.

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 0 points 9 months ago

.....Semetics/semitism?

Anti=against/opposite

[–] SolarTapestryofNoise 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not an analogy, T-Boner, that was a false equivalence. Sorry you are unable to comprehend basic English.