Silinde

joined 2 years ago
[–] Silinde -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah, there it is. Say it louder for those at 99 IQ in the back that you're lumping in with this guy. That is, if you think they're even smart enough to be able to understand you in the first place.

And it wasn't a question you posed at all- it was a generalised statement that you consider half the population to be "dumb", which, in a roundabout way, is where I've been going with this.

Edit: I see Lemmy is exactly the same as Reddit - full of so-called intellectuals that think of themselves as better then the average person, and that intellect is the sole barometer of usefulness in society. Keep downvoting me while thinking yourselves superior, fucking cowards.

[–] Silinde 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're the one that brought up IQ in the first place, you can't blame me for engaging on that.

It's hard to detect a joke when it doesn't exist in the first place.

[–] Silinde 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Approximately half the people in the world have an IQ in the double digit range. IQ literally has its mean at 100 for a given population. I don't think I understand what you're getting at there.

[–] Silinde 8 points 1 year ago

'List' is the correct abstract term for any data structure that holds a given number of values in an order, regardless of the implementation. So Python's List, or C++'s Array or Vector, or a Linked List are all considered lists in the abstract sense.

[–] Silinde 3 points 1 year ago

The burden of liability will then fall on the media company, which can then be sued for not carrying out due dilligance in reporting.

[–] Silinde 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because that's called Libel and is very much illegal in practically any country on earth - and depending on the country it's either easy or trivial to put forth and win a case of libel in court, since it's the onus of the defendant to prove what they said was entirely true, and "just trust me and this actress I hired, bro" doesn't cut it.

[–] Silinde 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The majority of the space on modern games is taken up by high definition audio. Those thousands of commentator lines add up to dozens of gigs alone.

[–] Silinde 1 points 1 year ago

Politics is fucked up, glad you noticed. Lib Dems are also sellout liars and there will never be another referendum. Sorry to burst all your bubbles at once, but that's the way it goes in this country.

[–] Silinde 8 points 1 year ago

I think it's more than fair to say if he's earning and living with you, he should be paying (even on top of the chores). £100/mo is more than fair on £900 earnings, I'd even go so far as to say £50/week is reasonable given the prices right now.

As for forgetting the chores, if he's anything like I was at that age, I'd imagine he doesn't care enough about the negative concequences of forgetting to do the chore to care about remembering, which is a hard thing to beat. It's unlikely he understands the importance of doing chores, which will obviously create problems for others in the years to come as he moves into houseshares with others.

The best solution I can think of is a two-pronged approach: speak to him and explain you'd like for him to be more responsible since he'll be forced to be responsible for himself when he moves out. Second, start charging for keep too, but offer a return on rent if he remembers to put the bins out by a certain time (one that isn't too late for you, since you will be the one that will be doing the job by default). Another idea I've seen, if you feel guilty taking more money than you need from him, is to keep aside some or all of it as savings for him, to give to him when he moves out to allow for him to pay his deposit and for anything he needs to buy when he moves in to his new place.

[–] Silinde 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Voting for a party that will get into bed with the Tories at the first sign of power coming their way, a party that has repeatedly said they will not do a deal with Labour, is a vote for another Tory hegemony.

Lib Dems had one chance to show they wouldn't sell out and they used it to betray their core demographic that got them power. They don't deserve a second chance.

[–] Silinde 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm surprised he said anything at all considering his track record on not taking a stance on things.

[–] Silinde 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TFW no husky hot and thirsty gf (she ran away) 😭

view more: ‹ prev next ›