Shapillon

joined 1 year ago
[–] Shapillon 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Shapillon 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, this is a hard decision that isn't usually taken on a whim ^^`

Personally I only speak with one of my sisters and a cousin.

[–] Shapillon 3 points 4 weeks ago

And each fig variety has a whole species of fig wasps wholly devoted to it and you cannot switch them around.

[–] Shapillon 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There's also Karl Marx's sister Onya.

She was a famous runner in her time and is still remembered at the start of every event.

[–] Shapillon 6 points 4 weeks ago

I haven't but will do so from now on.

[–] Shapillon 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word "women" which is more specific and less loaded.

And no, tits aren't sexual by essence. No body parts are and it's all social constructs.

  • Peoples who don't traditionally cover their chests don't tend to sexualize breasts either.
  • At some point in France, ankles used to be sexualised. It seems silly now, doesn't it?

Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.

Yes I am weird but I'm also right 😉

[–] Shapillon 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Incel has moved in English from "involutary celibate" to mysoginistic.

I'm not saying you are but you sure speak like one...

[–] Shapillon 10 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Calling women females is at best weird and insensitive for example.

[–] Shapillon 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There's an uncute one?

[–] Shapillon 15 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm still taking that over no representation at all 🤷‍♀️

Seriously though, representation as a background noise is - imho - one of the most potent tools for normalisation.

And the persons who did good representation haven't disappeared. They're still doing the lord's work.

view more: ‹ prev next ›