My bad, didn't appreciate it was referring to happiness in terms of social freedoms.
I meant for someone to have a good life without monetary worries on one side of the world it almost necessitates worse conditions elsewhere.
Oh dear someone has had a tantrum and resorted to shouting and ad hominiums.
I know solar is good and sounds like it works well for you in your part of the world. My only point is that it's not going to solve climate change like you make out.
I don't play Fortnite or Rocket League lmao.
Borderlands and Full Metal Furies spring to mind.
Always appreciated the levels of drawl it takes to squeeze this into one.
Yes they are the leaders in solar which is they are a good example... If the rest of the world was going at thier pace (it's not) it still wouldn't be fast enough.
Then we've got the degradation to worry about so the panels will all need regularly replacing whilst silver, gold and rare earth metals run out.
Rolling out that infrastructure is not likely to be smooth whilst most countries will be busy footing bills for the ongoing extreme weather. Not to mention the other potential blockers like wars, pandemics and lack of political will.
That last line sounds boundlessly optimistic and condescending in equal measures. Magic is real lol please. Of course I know sunlight comes from the sky and electricity can be used to play games consoles.
Not massively into D&B but this is one of my favourites:
I hadn't really noticed this, perhaps in hindsight you're correct. Can you be more specific?
Gareth in The Office was pervy/racist who pretty much needed the abuse to prevent him making other's lives hell.
With Maggie in Extras I saw it as a best friend banter type thing. The piss taking was done in private and came across in jest.
If you're referring to Karl Pilkington, I think he new what he signed up for, was playing an exaggerated version of himself for comedic effect and made a lot of money in doing so.
When Derek came out I couldn't get past the obvious, pretty much where I stopped following his material.
Fight? Sure.
Succeed without significant loss of life and infrastructure? Doubt.
Pets are usually provided with everything they ever need by their owners so they have little reason to show their brutal side.
Because they'll spend their free time enjoying each other's company instead of buying things they don't need?!
Apologies, no context was provided so it seems I wrongly assumed it was related to quality of life in general, not social freedoms.