Random123

True, but it won't pass the test for implementation, or the test of time, and probably not the test of foreign authorities

The test of time would be reassuring if people wernt so easily brainwashed. Its been common knowledge that “little” of anything toxic may not show immediate damage and turns out in long term but that hasnt stopped the majority of people from accepting carcinogens in their food, etc.

For common vaccines that have an extensive history of studies, i agree. But for recent vaccines that were prematurely approved for emergency use it is still wise to be skeptic because of the sane reason as before, corruption in the academic studies.

It is still too recent to not acknowledge the potential unidentified risks. Vaccines or not, the logic applies to anything newly developed.

Ok thats true i def agree with that but this is less about them and more about getting more studies done to solidify any findings and to discover any points points of interest

That is definitely a bad outcome and i wouldn't be surprised these guys would be aiming for that

Its not a thing about science if it were then we wouodnt see so many bullshit studies that attenpt to disprove climate change or how gas pollution doesnt exist.

Dont sit there acting like our science is untouched by politics and bad actors. You know damn well even peer reviewed studies can easily be made by malicious people

A reasonable skeptic is actually a smart one. And idiot will use absolute words or believe absolutely

Aside from getting data and potentially sell it to more 3rd parties, isnt this a good thing to further test some vaccines? Its fair to be open to the thought that not all vaccines are safe