He is wildly incorrect because he phrased it in an intentionally deceitful manner. It does not require 700 kilowatt hours of energy to transfer one Bitcoin one time. The verbiage quote "single transaction", is the entire problem with OPs post.
PlantDadManGuy
joined 2 years ago
I'm actually kind of proud of them for nominating her for that exact reason. It does give me some hope that in the Post Trump future women will be seen as real people.
Or perhaps the sex trafficking? You know to fly that child to the Bahamas so he could rape them?
This guy fucks
My wife is preggo and the baby looks healthy
I guess the modern day equivalent would be dissolving Twitter x, publicly hanging Elon musk, and actually putting Trump in jail. What a lovely dream.
I can only hope that this clusterfuck will expedite the gruesome death of our two-party system. I also find it hilarious that Missouri literally voted to ban ranked choice voting, because of scare tactics and the average voter being too stupid to understand that it's a better system.
*selectively enforced against poor people
Fully grown hogs can eat up to 20 lb of "food" per day....... Just sayin'
You dropped this -_-
You're arguing in bad faith and I'm not going to put up with your stupid straw man. Your statement was that it requires 700 kilowatt hours for a single transaction and that is blatantly false. You seem to ignore the obvious fact that Bitcoin can be transferred unlimited number of times and you do not have to re-mine the Bitcoin every single time you transfer it. As I said earlier, I already agree with you that Bitcoin sucks and you're wasting your time arguing with me over semantics.