PixxlMan

And yet it still can't retingulate droopglers. Pathetic.

I find the distinction that dynamically linking GPL is fine but statically linking it is not to be so ridiculous. That's obviously just an implementation detail. The only conceivable difference other than the pointless "technuchalley your program contains GPL code now as part of the file" is that you have to do dynamic linking, which is slightly slower. How does the fact that your work is dynamically linked vs statically linked make any difference to the people writing GPL libraries??

The message and the is sitewide and from reddit. Subreddit mods weren't involved

It's still 4B, even if just a fraction interact meaningfully is still a lot... And if it's growing it certainly isn't indicative of death

Not if it's encrypted ;-)

According to the quote they would've used breached passwords. You don't know anything about request limiting. It wasn't just randomly entering passwords unrestricted, as per your own quote.

Yeah, I don't think there could exist such a thing as an objective moral truth - per definition.

Objective != Better/stronger/more true

Just because something is clearly (to any sane human) true doesn't mean it's objective. It's can still be subjective.

An objective moral truth is basically an oxymoron

You can objectively say that humans think certain things are morally bankrupt but you cannot say that certain things are objectively morally bankrupt without specifying according to whom. Morals don't just float around space. Humans have them because of evolution and society.

I think much confusion here is around the word objective. We seem to be defining it differently. The way I define it, and I think the most idiomatic way to define it, there cannot, by definition, be such a thing as an objective moral truth

Edit: clarification

It's Linux though?