Pieisawesome

joined 2 years ago
[–] Pieisawesome 5 points 4 months ago

It was the norm to help transition things smoothly

[–] Pieisawesome 3 points 4 months ago

I think the point GP was trying to make was that Harris didn’t rely on the McDonald’s wage to put food on the table

[–] Pieisawesome 3 points 4 months ago

LLMs don’t see words, they see tokens. They were always just guessing

[–] Pieisawesome 3 points 4 months ago

The geico stuff was fake news

[–] Pieisawesome 2 points 4 months ago

Doesn’t matter, it will still scan for those devices

[–] Pieisawesome 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As I mentioned in other comments, I have no illusions that Gary Bowser is innocent or didn’t bring this all on himself. It’s his own fault he kept doing what he was doing.

However, the court doesn’t follow Gary from job to job initiating the process to garnish his wages.

It’s nintendo who is continuing to persecute Gary at this point, not the courts. Garnishing someone’s minimum wage job as a billion dollar corporation is uniquely evil.

I could be wrong, but I have not seen anything remotely close from EA, activision, blizzard, Microsoft, Sony, etc. and my original point was this is uniquely evil to Nintendo.

[–] Pieisawesome 3 points 4 months ago

Several gallons of water a day would kill you.

[–] Pieisawesome 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I agree that bowser brought the final outcome on himself, however, that does not expunge Nintendo of guilt.

They continue to collect their 30% or however much it is.

[–] Pieisawesome 27 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I mean they take like 33% of that guy named bowser’s life earnings. Which are severely reduced because they also got him thrown in jail for a felony.

That’s pretty uniquely evil

[–] Pieisawesome 5 points 4 months ago

Actually, you can, but they can send it right back overriding his veto.

It would be an empty gesture

[–] Pieisawesome 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works.

One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is).

If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement.

It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work.

Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments.

If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server.

view more: ‹ prev next ›