PapaStevesy

joined 8 months ago
[–] PapaStevesy 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

In the above thread, I see one person making an argument based on research they did, citing academic definitions and I see one person making an argument based on feelings and then abandoning it for ad hominem attacks as soon as they figured out they were incorrect. Guess which one you are?

[–] PapaStevesy 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What do you mean? I made a very lighthearted joke about your poor punctuation, you probably just didn't get it

[–] PapaStevesy 3 points 2 months ago

Additionally, the word is "wary"

[–] PapaStevesy 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

All words are up for interpretation, that's what language is. You just haven't made a real argument for how you're deciding to interpret "gaslighting."

[–] PapaStevesy 1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

No, you're objectively wrong based on the evidence put forth by both parties, maybe bring some of your own if you want to make a convincing argument.

[–] PapaStevesy 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Sorry you were wrong and it hurt your feelings, but you're clearly the rude one in this thread. Not sure what the color of their ass has to do with any of this though...

[–] PapaStevesy 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Yeah, because words used in modern context are always best defined by their most archaic usage 🙄🙄🙄

[–] PapaStevesy 6 points 2 months ago

South Dakota

[–] PapaStevesy 7 points 2 months ago

"Ja ja, ve make a little, ah...was ist rückweise bewegen?"

"Hike"

"Ve make a little hike! For Bideford."

[–] PapaStevesy 70 points 2 months ago

It's not cognitive dissonance if you can't remember what your values were to begin with.

[–] PapaStevesy 6 points 2 months ago
[–] PapaStevesy 4 points 2 months ago

Nah, I've heard Eurovision is generally a good, well-liked thing, no reason to let us ruin that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›