MrKaplan

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MrKaplan 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

4th place across all blocks by LW users.

the 3 ahead of it are 2 nsfw posters and a rather active user with political views not shared by most other users. note that 286 is just the overlap of weekly active users in the community that have blocked the account, not the total number of blocks.

[–] MrKaplan 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

using Lemmy 0.19.5 logic for counting local active weekly users, which includes all non-bot users that posted, commented or voted in the community, the number is about 3.15k. percentage wise, using the same calculation as in my other comment, the overlap with users that blocked the bot is at around 9.1% with 286 users blocking it. looking at active monthly users, this changes the numbers to about 5.7k active local users with 443 blocking it, which is about 7.7%.

for remote users these metrics cannot be pulled, as blocks are only visible to the blocking users instance.

fyi @[email protected]

[–] MrKaplan 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

there is no money involved for lemmy.world.

we are not paying for access to the MBFC database, they provide this for us free of charge, and we also don't receive any money from MBFC.

the community PAYS for the admins

this is straight up wrong, or at the very least misleading. LW/FHF admins receive zero money from any of the donations, all time spent is volunteered.

[–] MrKaplan 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

288 of local users that are also subscribed to [email protected] blocked the bot, which is about 1.2%.

when it comes to the topic of lying, it seems more like a misunderstanding from what i've heard after these comments were written.

[–] MrKaplan 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

we aren't holding back on lemmy updates due to sublinks.

[–] MrKaplan 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

a moderator on another instance than the community instance

[–] MrKaplan 24 points 3 months ago

that was a logic flaw for the selection of which reports are considered for alerting. a fix is currently being deployed, but you should be good for the next 2 days anyway.

[–] MrKaplan 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

yes, but for admins, at least on LW scale, this isn't something that is well usable for admins with built-in tools.

community mods and instance admins can see reports on the instance that reports are sent to, and they are currently only sent to the reporters instance, the community instance, and the reported users instance. community mods on another instance won't see the reports.

[–] MrKaplan 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

which browser and OS are you using? i haven't seen this yet with firefox, only not being logged in while it's loading

[–] MrKaplan 8 points 4 months ago

it doesn't work from the post listing, but if you go to the post directly the option should show up

[–] MrKaplan 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This section is fully removed in the next Lemmy release: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/pull/2639

[–] MrKaplan 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The animal abuse alleged at the time was that there was supposedly no healthy vegan cat food.

While the section of the rules was the same (violent content), animal abuse was a separate sentence, not the one about visual depictions:

No visual content depicting executions, murder, suicide, dismemberment, visible innards, excessive gore, or charred bodies. No content depicting, promoting or enabling animal abuse. No erotic or otherwise suggestive media or text content featuring depictions of rape, sexual assault, or non-consensual violence. All other violent content should be tagged NSFW.

This is the exact same paragraph we have today and we had before these changes.

If there was no healthy vegan cat food then this would be considered content enabling animal abuse.

view more: ‹ prev next ›