MediaSensationalism

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MediaSensationalism 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What the fuck? Anyone mining crypto or running servers at home better watch out before their energy company tips off their local gang and gets them raided.

Go solar.

[–] MediaSensationalism 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the story the buyer told. The baby was badly neglected.

[–] MediaSensationalism 33 points 1 month ago (9 children)

My only weakness was not being cynical enough.

[–] MediaSensationalism 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

San Francisco explicitly approved drones and robots armed with remote explosives less than two years ago, and last year Axon's board of ethics resigned after TASER-armed drones were announced. These are emerging technologies, and larger departments are always licking their lips at the potential for new toys.

[–] MediaSensationalism 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The other 39% view it unfavorably but don't have the spine to speak out against their own party when they know the poll results will be publicized.

[–] MediaSensationalism 5 points 2 months ago

I don't know much about Aldi, but anything is better than Walmart.

[–] MediaSensationalism 9 points 2 months ago

Watched muted. Message still received.

[–] MediaSensationalism 3 points 2 months ago

Machoke Meowth

[–] MediaSensationalism 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A lot, actually. Tons of money is being poured into raising up popular propagandists because it works. Russia was caught doing it just recently.

[–] MediaSensationalism 2 points 2 months ago

I've disabled what I can while I wait for my carrier to unlock it. Graphene awaits.

[–] MediaSensationalism 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
 

I've experienced similar issues on a local level, sometimes not even getting a response to requests at all. I've encountered law enforcement in online forums who seemed to have complete contempt for the public, bragging that they would deny any records request that came across their desk regardless of the validity or legality of it, and with complete confidence that they would not be penalized for their antisocial antics.

 

Do you feel that the 4th amendment should protect them? Or perhaps a new amendment should be written to protect them and abolish power of subpoena?

I'm slightly biased as I ask this. I feel that the mind is "sacred" in a sense, that it should be considered a fundamental human right for an individual to be able to preserve privacy over their internally held thoughts and memories, and that the ability of the court to force an individual to speak or disclose part of their mind is a wild overreach of power and an affront to the personal liberty of the innocent.

 

I'm starting to like this news outlet.

 

The DOJ COPS portal also has plenty of other law enforcement guidance material to peruse.

12
Google Data Collection (PDF) (digitalcontentnext.org)
submitted 3 months ago by MediaSensationalism to c/privacy
view more: next ›