To be fair, Indiana basically is Florida, just minus a few alligators.
I get it, you've been taking abuse from fans throughout the game, and it's a hot and stressful situation. But man, how stupid do you have to be to shout out something like that?
HUGE improvement over the web platform. Keep up the good work!
That's always a possibility. I get the feeling that there's strong interest in some of the ownership groups, and the "unnamed source" specifically said that the vote isn't dead, just delayed. I'm still hopeful it will happen.
Sounds like clubs wanted more clarification on what exactly they were voting on, which is a good sign. I'm glad to see they're doing their due diligence before moving forward, regardless of which way the vote goes.
It's featured heavily because the kit is based on on it. I know it doesn't meet the current modern standards, but I will say it's grown on me over the past few years.
Agree 100%.My only concern is that I just don't have much time to post on here, let alone truly moderate things, and I'd hate to see it die as a result of me not putting in enough content.
That being said, I should really post the power rankings, even though I shudder to think about how low DCFC has to have sunk by now...
Dammit, first unique post on this sub and it had to be about the creek puppies beating Le Rouge?!
Seriously, good game. You guys are really tough this season.
a big part of the hesitation is exponentially increased cost as travel moves from small regional “bus” leagues to more frequent long distance travel.
I think that can be addressed by profit sharing from the league. One of the things I learned from "Welcome to Wrexham" (which of course makes me fully qualified to be a club manager), when you're promoted in the English system, your club gets a higher "allowance" which you can use to offset higher salaries, travel costs, etc. I'm not sure where that income comes from (TV revenue, maybe?), and clearly the USL isn't making squat from it's current deal, but in the future that might be a way to help the smaller clubs handle the higher expenses.
if Madison moved up, they wouldn’t be able to increase attendance much without a bigger venue
Even the popular clubs like Forward Madison don't sell out every game, so you have to figure there's room for improvement in attendance and moving up would attract new/casual fans. Look at Cincinnati or Nashville as examples. They drew good crowds in the USL days, but really got big crowds when they moved up to MLS. Detroit has had consistently larger crowds since moving up from NISA, and that's without a change in venue.
That being said, I think every club should be looking to improve their housing situation until they have their own, high quality SSS. As much as I dislike MLS, I give them credit for their stadium requirements, and have to admit I'm jealous of some of their facilities. I love Keyworth, but would also love to see DCFC build their own place with some of the charms of the old stadiums.
So the TLDR response is I agree there would be major hurdles, but in the long run I think it can work. It'll be interesting to see how the vote goes.
Traverse City, up at the tip of the Lower Peninsula, holds a Cherry Fest every year and also produces some of the best wine in the country. The Great Lakes (Lake Michigan in particular) help to moderate temperatures, and we get a good amount of precipitation every year. Our cherries and apples are outstanding.
source: born and raised Michigander
I hadn't read that. I do wonder how much age plays a role in the length of the contract. I mean, it's a lot easier to sign someone for almost five years when you know they'll still be in their early 20s when the contract expires than it is to offer it to someone who will be in their late 30s!
Didn't they just hire the coach this year?